Looking up this person, Dr. Derek Knauss (or Derick Knauss) gives me absolutely nothing except links to websites posting this story in one form or another. Looking up Dereck/Derick Knauss on a people finder produced zero results in CA (he said he works in Southern CA). Looking him up on scholar.google.com also provides nothing. Zero, zilch, nada, which is basically impossible if he is in fact a Ph.D.
There is NO evidence that this person exists or does the job he says he does, therefore this person is not a source of credible information.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence however. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.
There is much, much more evidence that it has been isolated and tested. Please note I am not saying that the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are accurate (or even close, or even any at all). I am not saying anything about this scamdemic (in this post) OTHER than that the sars-cov-2 has been isolated and is a real virus.
If anyone can provide evidence that these are untrue assertions I will be more than happy to look into it.
Sir you have only one source of info that we Know is fact, the HIV transmission sourse which we have known for a solid year now...ALL your sources arefrom organizations that we also KNow have been lying to us for a year now. Not sure your motives, but to use sources from known liars seems a bit disingenuous to try to disprove another. You seem to be part of the problem.
Yes. I agree. What Slyver mentioned, concerning this patented virus, was everything that we were told from the beginning. We were told that it had HIV, came from WUHAN, was extremely virulent, and de novo. The only thing is, the researchers that had "supposedly" isolated the COV-2 novel virus, were all disingenuous with a motive to keep America locked down and in fear. Many virologists/scientists have been killed and silenced, that had evidence otherwise.
What would constitute proof? Pictures? They exist, but could be made up, or from a different coronavirus. DNA? I've provided several sources for that (if you took the time to look instead of dismissing out of hand). Tests on the virus itself? I provided links to that as well and can provide hundreds more.
Even if the virus were to be isolated, what does it mean? What constitutes a case? People have been tested when not even being sick. Why? Is it even contagious? Does it mean it's virulent enough to lock down the world, wear cloth masks, use excessive sanitization techniques, socially distance, and cause extreme psychological fear and long term damage? I'm not shooting the messenger. I'm just thinking...We are surrounded by so many microorganisms all day, constantly... What is the point of terrorizing people, spending tons of money on studying, testing, etc. It's a virus that isn't even deadly. There are so many other viruses and diseases that are way more deadly. Anyway, just my thoughts.
Looking up this person, Dr. Derek Knauss (or Derick Knauss) gives me absolutely nothing except links to websites posting this story in one form or another. Looking up Dereck/Derick Knauss on a people finder produced zero results in CA (he said he works in Southern CA). Looking him up on scholar.google.com also provides nothing. Zero, zilch, nada, which is basically impossible if he is in fact a Ph.D.
There is NO evidence that this person exists or does the job he says he does, therefore this person is not a source of credible information.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence however. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
For example:
There is much, much more evidence that it has been isolated and tested. Please note I am not saying that the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are accurate (or even close, or even any at all). I am not saying anything about this scamdemic (in this post) OTHER than that the sars-cov-2 has been isolated and is a real virus.
If anyone can provide evidence that these are untrue assertions I will be more than happy to look into it.
Sir you have only one source of info that we Know is fact, the HIV transmission sourse which we have known for a solid year now...ALL your sources arefrom organizations that we also KNow have been lying to us for a year now. Not sure your motives, but to use sources from known liars seems a bit disingenuous to try to disprove another. You seem to be part of the problem.
....And find me the lab, in the entire world, that will Show they actually have a covid-19 virus isolated within that lab....Ill wait...
Yes. I agree. What Slyver mentioned, concerning this patented virus, was everything that we were told from the beginning. We were told that it had HIV, came from WUHAN, was extremely virulent, and de novo. The only thing is, the researchers that had "supposedly" isolated the COV-2 novel virus, were all disingenuous with a motive to keep America locked down and in fear. Many virologists/scientists have been killed and silenced, that had evidence otherwise.
What would constitute proof? Pictures? They exist, but could be made up, or from a different coronavirus. DNA? I've provided several sources for that (if you took the time to look instead of dismissing out of hand). Tests on the virus itself? I provided links to that as well and can provide hundreds more.
What exactly would you like to see?
Even if the virus were to be isolated, what does it mean? What constitutes a case? People have been tested when not even being sick. Why? Is it even contagious? Does it mean it's virulent enough to lock down the world, wear cloth masks, use excessive sanitization techniques, socially distance, and cause extreme psychological fear and long term damage? I'm not shooting the messenger. I'm just thinking...We are surrounded by so many microorganisms all day, constantly... What is the point of terrorizing people, spending tons of money on studying, testing, etc. It's a virus that isn't even deadly. There are so many other viruses and diseases that are way more deadly. Anyway, just my thoughts.
A quote from someone who agrees with me. He doesn't have to exist.