Thanks for consolidating! (I saw someone else insisting that the second angle required his own thread, so I presume this is consolidating).
And I hadn’t seen this second angle it until now.
And it’s interesting, illuminating, maybe explanatory, but doesn’t seem dispositive. (granted, I’m watching all of these on muh phone).
It seems the black foam microphone, from this angle, actually does come in behind Biden’s hand because that dumb fart practically walks into it so he can mumble something out of his cuckmasked face. But now, to me, that black foam mic seems now to be legit.
But after seeing the second view, that big gray deadcat honestly seems even more suspicious to me. From the the second angle, in my quick review, it really doesn’t appear to go directly behind Joepedo’s hand/arm (it’s at the very bottom of the frame)from the perspective of the first camera; the one on the first video certainly does. And the one in the first view seems well to the audience-right of The Pervert-in-Chief’s centerline, but the one in the second shot seems well to the audience-left of that line.
But are these two different gray deadcats? That’s conceivable and this could be a trick of camera angles, but if there were, it absolutely seems that I’d have been at least able to catch at least a glimpse of both in one or both videos, and in neither did I see evidence a second big gray deadcat. So again, maybe I still missing something, in which case, point it out, frens. But where I’m now at (and no, I don’t really know why I latched into this this evening. oh, wait, yes I do. I’m procrastinating!?):
the black foam mic now seems quite legit, although Biden is a lurching idiot.
everything on the second video seems legit, I presume, and it helped make better sense of the first one
but the gray dead on the second angle still seems oddly superimposed, and then inexplicably masked. And that, view, and that mic, were indeed the ones first called out by the OP.
I wish I was in front of my computer right now, and could view both simultaneously. But that would make me feel like even more of an obsessive that I feel like right now, flipping between tabs on my phone, looking at f’ing microphones and cheating scumbags waaay more than I ever wanted to.
Everyone is talking about the nature of the video but I want to point out the audio transcript. Biden's statements are brief and 100% unspecific, leaving plenty of room to insert a wide range of content from the Reporters.
Q: 'Do you have any plans to travel to the Southern border sites?'
Answer:
Not at the moment
Q: 'Have you decided when you're able to share shots with other countries, is it allies or neighbors first? Who will be the first countries to get the US's vaccine?
Answer:
'I've been talking with other countries already. I'll let you know the answer to that very shortly.
Both replies have zero context. Any subject could have been inserted with the reporters audio portion, which already seems disconnected to Xiden's audio and the helicopter noise in the background.
Second angle: https://streamable.com/wl0jtc
Thanks for consolidating! (I saw someone else insisting that the second angle required his own thread, so I presume this is consolidating).
And I hadn’t seen this second angle it until now.
And it’s interesting, illuminating, maybe explanatory, but doesn’t seem dispositive. (granted, I’m watching all of these on muh phone).
It seems the black foam microphone, from this angle, actually does come in behind Biden’s hand because that dumb fart practically walks into it so he can mumble something out of his cuckmasked face. But now, to me, that black foam mic seems now to be legit.
But after seeing the second view, that big gray deadcat honestly seems even more suspicious to me. From the the second angle, in my quick review, it really doesn’t appear to go directly behind Joepedo’s hand/arm (it’s at the very bottom of the frame)from the perspective of the first camera; the one on the first video certainly does. And the one in the first view seems well to the audience-right of The Pervert-in-Chief’s centerline, but the one in the second shot seems well to the audience-left of that line.
But are these two different gray deadcats? That’s conceivable and this could be a trick of camera angles, but if there were, it absolutely seems that I’d have been at least able to catch at least a glimpse of both in one or both videos, and in neither did I see evidence a second big gray deadcat. So again, maybe I still missing something, in which case, point it out, frens. But where I’m now at (and no, I don’t really know why I latched into this this evening. oh, wait, yes I do. I’m procrastinating!?):
I wish I was in front of my computer right now, and could view both simultaneously. But that would make me feel like even more of an obsessive that I feel like right now, flipping between tabs on my phone, looking at f’ing microphones and cheating scumbags waaay more than I ever wanted to.
His hand goes over the black mic in the beginning. Is he actually that close to the reporters?
Seems odd that they'd fuck it up on two different angles, but that sure as hell doesn't look right.
Shameless piggyback on your comment.
Everyone is talking about the nature of the video but I want to point out the audio transcript. Biden's statements are brief and 100% unspecific, leaving plenty of room to insert a wide range of content from the Reporters.
Q: 'Do you have any plans to travel to the Southern border sites?' Answer:
Q: 'Have you decided when you're able to share shots with other countries, is it allies or neighbors first? Who will be the first countries to get the US's vaccine? Answer:
Both replies have zero context. Any subject could have been inserted with the reporters audio portion, which already seems disconnected to Xiden's audio and the helicopter noise in the background.