So in one of my forays into the MSM morass to see what my FIL and other family members see for the news, I saw an article about Sharon McMahon, a former government and law teacher who is using Instagram to teach about the US government. Out of curiosity, I followed her. She is cheerful, fun, and engaging, Usually, she asks daily, "How Can I Help?" And lots of people ask questions about current events pertaining to our government. Both Rs and Ds. She has also asked everyone to write down what their political party does well and poorly. So people from all political spectrums are exposed to how people from other sides of the political spectrum think.
She has grown exponentially recently with exposure on a late night show, interviews on CNN, and others. As I saw all these people engage with her and learn how their government works, I started to go, "Hmmm, could she be.... part of the Plan?" If you look at the people asking questions, you cringe at what they don't know if you've been watching FoxNews for decades as I used to. There's a phrase used often now, "explain it to me like I'm 5, thanks." And she's teaching how our government is supposed to work - reaching more and more people daily.
I've seen people ask daily here, how people are ever going to learn about such and such when they're so ignorant and not willing to learn. So something else happened yesterday, that again made me go "hmmmm".
James Grant, a 28 year-old Wharton School (ahem! DJT's school?) professor is also an author and Sharon interviewed him yesterday. An organizational psychologist, he was discussing his new book called "Think Again". I missed their talk, but saw the screenshots Sharon posted of what people learned from their discussion. Here is just one: "That I SUCK at listening to understand" Another one. "I need to recognize my defensive reaction to differing opinions and just actively listen" "Holy crap!" was my out-loud reaction to the two screens worth of people re-evaluating how they need to think and engage with others.
I am now almost positive these two are part of the plan to start healing the division that exists because now those following Sharon will have the tools to learn how to listen. People who were never curious about how their government worked, are learning to be "us" and be curious. They've heard from Sharon to wonder why someone is yelling at you to be scared of something. To wonder why someone is trying so hard to get you to think a certain way and to question who is telling you that. Add in what they learned from Adam yesterday, and I am seeing huge mind shifts in a lot of people that many of us here thought would never be capable of learning and having independent thought.
If you want to see many things, follow Sharon McMahon on Instagram at @SharonSaysSo. I will be getting Adam's book as I am very curious about what he has to say. It's already a bestseller.
That is highly encouraging that people are stepping up to teach and that people are engaging with them! I don't think that makes them part of THE plan as in planners but more a product of the The Plan. There has always been the part where Patriots step up and carry the torch or the rifle or whatever is needed to participate as citizens in helping one another understand.
So Sharon is a patriot but doesn't yet come across as one of us. She says Reuters and AP news are trusted news sources and I see a lot of liberal spin in what she says. But that also works to draw in people to her feed because they will see her as "one of them". She also said she looked into Q and determined that it wasn't true, or something like that.
I always see THE Plan as having a lot of tentacles or plot lines where people are given a task and the support needed and they go off and execute, as a sub-plot. She got a lot of media support initially to get her name out there.
I have thought that too. Seemed like Conservative Treehouse and Brian Cates red pill but "disavow" Q. Doesn't make any sense to me from a logical perspective.
I was an avid Treeper for many years, following along with the FISA FOIA adventures. That was my hangout site until I found GA. I didn't know about Q (except for hearing about the QAnon conspiracy theorists) until the Friday after the election when I stumbled on a libertarian publication where a former military officer wrote an article stating that he thought Q was real and a military intelligence operation. He had a link to the Proofs video which convinced him. As a former Air Force officer, he hooked me and the Proofs video reeled me and the rest of my family in.
Warren Buffett also went there
Good post, listening to opposing opinions and having open discussions is always a good start.
Makes as much sense as anything else. Wharton vs Rhodes? Maybe Q is a Fighting Quaker.
There is no Qanon. There is Q and anons.
Is Sharon McMahon anon?
^ not a trick question.
I understand that there is no QAnon. But when others say they looked into 'QAnon' I use the term they used. As I wrote in my post, I think she is part of the plan, but whether she is an anon? I don't know. I would guess that she was asked to do what she's doing on Instagram and not given the real reason. Or they realized what she was already doing and "helped" her get a bigger following.
Which Q post was it where Q stated that it's crucial that anons speculate who Q is and name them all for the deep state to target?
If you're wrong, you're wrong.
If you're right, you're not doing anyone any favors.