Define nuclear stand-off.
Who benefits?
How do you 'squeeze' funds out of the US?
Squeeze always bugged me here. Why the quotes?
I get the overall drop was about Iran. But most of the points are economic.
GME short squeeze is the market equivalent of a nuclear strike. If it's shorted as much as most think it is, it has the potential to crash the market. Tens to Hundreds of trillions at stake.
If the shorts don't cover, expecting to use trickery to push out their calls another month, and the earnings call is good, then the stock isn't going to drop, people aren't going to sell, and the bill comes due in April- on the 16th and 23rd.
It has the potential, and I'm not holding enough to retire now... but retire a few years early.
I have another few interesting tidbits. If they sacrificed a couple of hedgies and paid out investors, that would be one thing. That would put a lot of hurt on some big time elites.
If they don't, and try to backstop the losses, taxpayers will end up footing the bill- #1241 speaking to this. This would have some 1929-level repercussions.
If congress hands out a deus ex machina, and puts a stop to it, then what?
That CoA is playing out a bit now in darkness, and it's not congress in control. Strings are being pulled and manipulation is being allowed to preserve a thin veneer of confidence in the market. I think if that happens, the market implodes anyway.
Is the whole thing cohencidence or Qincidence? (sry, couldn't help myself!)
HFs do this shorting crap all the time. I don't mean speculative shorting, but an effort to drive the price. Usually not to this scale, and usually don't get dogpiled, allowing them to get away with it. It was a matter of time, and sunlight. Predicting the squeeze would happen is no big deal, but when and which company is the tough part.
Assuming that Q is a few people, each with their own area of expertise, one would have to be looking at financial aspects of the plan. The particulars could be seen, ramping up, to the right person with access. That's a small number of people.
I think it was a gentle nudge in December that set this particular table, not a Q post. Something else, to reach a different audience- hairy-knuckled apes with iron-fisted grips on their money. Think about it.. it's a damn near perfect stock to do it with... no widespread repercussions if it goes under, but a name recognition begging for millennial gamblers to rally around.
I wonder where the very first post on WSB about GME came from. And by whom.
I've said it a few times here, but I still wonder what Mnuchin's role in the plan has been. He strikes me as part of THE team. Quietly loyal. Had the access for four years. Knows the biz from his time at Goldman Sachs. Knows the value of a good Hollywood production. Is this his baby, his gift to us?
My 2nd theory is we need to drive the dollar to zero so we can ditch the FED and switch to some kind of gold/silver/cripto back currency.
What better way to drive it to zero than print it and give it to bored out of work gorillas?
It is a way more sexy theory, but requires lots more crayons to prove. The FED shutting down for two hours a few weeks back felt like a test of some sort. By who or what I have no clue.
And I would like to add I have nothing to back any of this up other than my freedom to think.
I'm trying to understand the GME connection because there has to be one. The shorts started this a year ago, or even longer.
Tomorrow should be a habbening. Earnings call and the day short contracts from Friday's calls are due for delivery.
http://qalerts.app/?n=1241
Define nuclear stand-off. Who benefits? How do you 'squeeze' funds out of the US?
Dont bank on that, throw the cash you earn into physical silver buys to lock in the financial gains after everything fiscal goes to hell.
Then spread it to whomever deserves and needs it as you see fit. Youll be a prince among men by then if this plays the way im seeing it will...
Whats the best place to buy silver?
Crash the market worse than 1929? "Suicide weekend"?
Well I'm very thrilled to be part of history being made, but I won't lie, I hope I can retire after the squeeze.
It has the potential, and I'm not holding enough to retire now... but retire a few years early.
I have another few interesting tidbits. If they sacrificed a couple of hedgies and paid out investors, that would be one thing. That would put a lot of hurt on some big time elites.
If they don't, and try to backstop the losses, taxpayers will end up footing the bill- #1241 speaking to this. This would have some 1929-level repercussions.
If congress hands out a deus ex machina, and puts a stop to it, then what?
That CoA is playing out a bit now in darkness, and it's not congress in control. Strings are being pulled and manipulation is being allowed to preserve a thin veneer of confidence in the market. I think if that happens, the market implodes anyway.
Is the whole thing cohencidence or Qincidence? (sry, couldn't help myself!)
HFs do this shorting crap all the time. I don't mean speculative shorting, but an effort to drive the price. Usually not to this scale, and usually don't get dogpiled, allowing them to get away with it. It was a matter of time, and sunlight. Predicting the squeeze would happen is no big deal, but when and which company is the tough part.
Assuming that Q is a few people, each with their own area of expertise, one would have to be looking at financial aspects of the plan. The particulars could be seen, ramping up, to the right person with access. That's a small number of people.
I think it was a gentle nudge in December that set this particular table, not a Q post. Something else, to reach a different audience- hairy-knuckled apes with iron-fisted grips on their money. Think about it.. it's a damn near perfect stock to do it with... no widespread repercussions if it goes under, but a name recognition begging for millennial gamblers to rally around.
I wonder where the very first post on WSB about GME came from. And by whom.
I've said it a few times here, but I still wonder what Mnuchin's role in the plan has been. He strikes me as part of THE team. Quietly loyal. Had the access for four years. Knows the biz from his time at Goldman Sachs. Knows the value of a good Hollywood production. Is this his baby, his gift to us?
This is my theory, and yes in fact I do eat crayons and sniff glue for fun.
It is not a very sexy theory but I feel like the whole point was to drive China Investors out of the market. And it looks like it worked.
It's a tangential benefit that is for sure, but looks like a rothschild waterloo playbook being enacted in slow motion to me.
My 2nd theory is we need to drive the dollar to zero so we can ditch the FED and switch to some kind of gold/silver/cripto back currency.
What better way to drive it to zero than print it and give it to bored out of work gorillas?
It is a way more sexy theory, but requires lots more crayons to prove. The FED shutting down for two hours a few weeks back felt like a test of some sort. By who or what I have no clue.
And I would like to add I have nothing to back any of this up other than my freedom to think.
Gme is fiscal warfront. Engage if capable, otherwise promote the activity.