I know... it's so hard. I come here everyday to keep faith with all of you. We've been let down so many times because we chase and decipher so many coms that don't come to fruition. I just have to believe that Trump won't let us down.
I suggest you start with the Q drops of late 2018 and work back to the first ones-I do believe you will see the timeline much more clearly-'future proves past....
Unpopular opinion but true. We go from military insider to Quantum computer without evidence or mention by Q. There is no drop about a quantum computer being on the team. 10 ppl was clearly stated by Q.
I’m fairly new to this (last 6 months) & I haven’t read all the drops, so I am certainly no expert.
That being said, isn’t it possible, even reasonable and logical, that there is more to things than what Q shared?
I’m not saying guaranteed, but isn’t it conceivable Q shared just enough to persuade and enlighten, but not so much as to tip their hand to others?
Speculating about more beyond what Q shared seems reasonable to me because there has to be more. Simply, we don’t know what we don’t know and it’s only logical to accept that there is a lot we don’t know.
I see no harm in theorizing about what we don’t know. People, as always, should do their own research and decide for them selves what they believe to be true. Not extrapolating or considering beyond Q’s drops seems very limiting, IMHO.
That's misleading! Q stated "Less (sic) than 10" of whom 3 are non military. I know it's a really difficult calculation but think of a number between 3 and 9. That's the Q team.
I know... it's so hard. I come here everyday to keep faith with all of you. We've been let down so many times because we chase and decipher so many coms that don't come to fruition. I just have to believe that Trump won't let us down.
I suggest you start with the Q drops of late 2018 and work back to the first ones-I do believe you will see the timeline much more clearly-'future proves past....
The comms of 2018 were mostly for 2018. You’re creating false narratives in your head with this method.
Unpopular opinion but true. We go from military insider to Quantum computer without evidence or mention by Q. There is no drop about a quantum computer being on the team. 10 ppl was clearly stated by Q.
I’m fairly new to this (last 6 months) & I haven’t read all the drops, so I am certainly no expert.
That being said, isn’t it possible, even reasonable and logical, that there is more to things than what Q shared?
I’m not saying guaranteed, but isn’t it conceivable Q shared just enough to persuade and enlighten, but not so much as to tip their hand to others?
Speculating about more beyond what Q shared seems reasonable to me because there has to be more. Simply, we don’t know what we don’t know and it’s only logical to accept that there is a lot we don’t know.
I see no harm in theorizing about what we don’t know. People, as always, should do their own research and decide for them selves what they believe to be true. Not extrapolating or considering beyond Q’s drops seems very limiting, IMHO.
That's misleading! Q stated "Less (sic) than 10" of whom 3 are non military. I know it's a really difficult calculation but think of a number between 3 and 9. That's the Q team.
What about the deltas??? 1,2,and 3 year deltas prove the timeline aspect...
Someone wrote second impeachment in 2018. Implying they were predicting this last one. So there was a delta of some sort.
You guys are going in circles.
You’re treating the tweets like a bible.
Q isn’t god manufacturing the time line 3 years ahead. Especially in randomly connected happenings.
The closer we get to The Storm, the busier the Q team will be...that plus the great Q quote: "you have more than you know"...
Q no longer needs to mislead the deep state. (Can you guess why?)
As far as we know.
I like recalling that we have NO idea what's come to pass already, and what's about to happen, that we won't find out about for months. It's all good.