Define Evergreen [HRC USSS code name]
Non-standard defintion.
Think depopulation.
Evergreen = Stay young forever = Adrenochrome
This means HRC's codename was chosen because ADC was a critical part of her life. Not just for usage for herself but it was probably her primary business. Think Clinton Foundation - Haiti - Kids. Not too hard to believe this connection to her codename.
What about the Evergreen company? Did they choose this name very intentionally. Was their primary goal to facilitate human trafficing?
Consider this: Chairman of Evergreen Group Chang Yung-fa, died at age 88 in 2016.
To be precise, he died on Jan 20 2016. The day DJT was inaugurated!
https://container-mag.com/2016/02/22/evergreen-late-founders-youngest-son-to-take-over-company/
Coincidence?
Or was this because Evergreen was such a key player in this abomination, that it was imperative to behead them on Day 0 of his presidency?
Here is another interesting tidbit:
The children of the Evergreen Group’s late founder’s first wife used their combined voting power to terminate the position of chairman in response to Chang Yung-fa’s youngest son announcement that he would step in as head of the company, local media reported.
So lets look at what is happening here logically. The head of the beast was decapitated on the very day Trump, who had vowed to save the children, took office. And no new head was allowed to grow. Is it perhaps because, it would be easy for the Patriots to control the beast if it had no head ?
Was the very step taken by Trump, neutralisation of the biggest trafficking shipment company, and with that take off the currency of the Cabal, helping him bring down all the other pieces slowly?
I think there is a lot more to dig in Evergreen.
Really good dig! Makes perfect sense!
Assuming we start from the point of Trump being selected to run, that could be mid 70s onwards.( watching preparing building a good guy framework in a bad guy world).
You might even have to look at Col Oliver North, General Schwarzkopf and Colin Powell and wonder whether they may have been part of the plan ( good or bad?).
What we are witnessing almost daily are events and coincidences that may just be tying up loose ends from a plan that might have been signed off 10 years ago or more and as you say was actioned on Inauguration Day of President Trump.
Key players might have been terminated any time since and as the world slept no one noticed.
The anti trump movement was pretty much good to go on his inauguration which suggests that Obama, No name and Co were aware that their plan was not only foiled but that retribution had commenced.
Q defines KEYSTONE as:
https://qagg.news/?read=269
https://qagg.news/?read=167
https://qagg.news/?read=271
https://qagg.news/?read=2661
Yes, I am aware. The question in the title was not meant to be literal. Just meant to be a discussion whether Evergreen is much more at the heart of all this than just an isolated event.
I'm with you. I think the Evergreen is very connected, if not THE thing that is about to shock the world, once exposed. Hence, a keystone.
President Trump was inaugurated the following year on Jan. 20, 2017. If you can tie in the 1-year delta, that's cool, but hard to believe Trump/Q had anything to do with his death given they had no power in 2016.
Ah good point, my bad. Got carried away :(
How many millions of baby girls can they extract adrenochrome from when the Chy-Na leaders put a one child per family rule into effect? Don't think they just toss them into some compost heap.
A lot of mysteries now start makign sense. Remember the stories we used to hear that many Chinese families would get rid of their baby girls during one child policy? And how there were these rogue agents who would take bribes and dispose of the unwanted child? Now it makes sense what was going on with these children, because the population of chine has since been skewed towards males. Meaning, these babies never grew up.
Evergreen is just a cog. Nothing more. And only one source for [them]. How many global shipping companies are there? How many are owned by [them]?