Why does Q make such a big deal out of the fact Q posts started the day President Trump appointed Durham as U.S. Attorney in Connecticut? Is it just a smokescreen? Why is this guy Fleitz misrepresenting Durham’s authority? Durham’s Special Counsel appointment letter gives him authority to prosecute as he sees fit. Here’s the statement from the letter.
(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from his investigation ofthese matters.
Do we really understand all the comms? Somedays, many days, it is confusing. Is it possible the relationship of events is upside down? Durham isn’t the key to President Trump being restored to office? President Trump being restored to office is the key to Durham bringing down the DS? And hopefully not through the judicial branch and liberal D.C. juries. More questions than answers, sorry.
I would be interested in answers to all these questions, too.
But my feeling is that a big bang presentation of election fraud proofs is more important for Trump visibly coming back. Not for legal reasons, because legally Trump still is president, but for giving a reason to the public.
Makes sense. Rudy Giuliani sometimes seemed to do more harm than good, but one day in late November he said something to the effect, we have to prepare people to accept the reality that President Trump actually won.
Why does Q make such a big deal out of the fact Q posts started the day President Trump appointed Durham as U.S. Attorney in Connecticut? Is it just a smokescreen? Why is this guy Fleitz misrepresenting Durham’s authority? Durham’s Special Counsel appointment letter gives him authority to prosecute as he sees fit. Here’s the statement from the letter.
Do we really understand all the comms? Somedays, many days, it is confusing. Is it possible the relationship of events is upside down? Durham isn’t the key to President Trump being restored to office? President Trump being restored to office is the key to Durham bringing down the DS? And hopefully not through the judicial branch and liberal D.C. juries. More questions than answers, sorry.
I would be interested in answers to all these questions, too. But my feeling is that a big bang presentation of election fraud proofs is more important for Trump visibly coming back. Not for legal reasons, because legally Trump still is president, but for giving a reason to the public.
Makes sense. Rudy Giuliani sometimes seemed to do more harm than good, but one day in late November he said something to the effect, we have to prepare people to accept the reality that President Trump actually won.