This is a non-canonical book, which means the Church did not accept it as true. You can read it, of course, but it does not mesh with the rest of the Gospels. It sounds kind of contemporary to me. I can't imagine Jesus saying "they will be disturbed." Can you? Why would you marvel if you are disturbed? And how would marveling lead you to reign over all. And, did Jesus promote "reigning over all"? He promoted serving all.
It doesn't 100% mesh with the Gospels because the Gospels were the beginning of the Great Apostasy, the turning away of Christianity from the original teachings of Christ.
This is a non-canonical book, which means the Church did not accept it as true. You can read it, of course, but it does not mesh with the rest of the Gospels. It sounds kind of contemporary to me. I can't imagine Jesus saying "they will be disturbed." Can you? Why would you marvel if you are disturbed? And how would marveling lead you to reign over all. And, did Jesus promote "reigning over all"? He promoted serving all.
The gospel of Thomas wasn’t discovered until 1945, so how could they include it?
You really are dumb, aren't you? Do you think Thomas wrote it, tucked it into a jar, and nobody saw it for 2,000 years? Really?
SEVERAL EARLY CHURCH FATHERS QUOTED IT.
Also, the fact it disappeared for around 1,500 years is not exactly an argument in its favor.
Ok. Great. Have a nice day.
The “Church”.
It doesn't 100% mesh with the Gospels because the Gospels were the beginning of the Great Apostasy, the turning away of Christianity from the original teachings of Christ.