When did you become the rule maker? If adding a few numbers together makes people feel better why are you here trying to stop them? We don't know all the ways Q is trying to communicate with us. People tinkering with this stuff may discover the true coms route one day. Stop spreading your negativity. If its not for you, move along.
Not a rulemaking situation. I just ask what I consider logical questions about stuff I encounter, in an effort to get at the truth or understand things better.
E.g., Really, why stop at Q2629? Why NOT add up the digits and get 18, then scrutinize Q18; then add the 1 + 8 and check Q9, and try to relate them to the present day? How do you know when not to do that? What's the 'rule' being applied there? Is there any, or is it just arbitrary? These questions and the others seem sensible to ask.
I agree, no need for negativity. It's OK if answering those is not for you, move along. :)
When did you become the rule maker? If adding a few numbers together makes people feel better why are you here trying to stop them? We don't know all the ways Q is trying to communicate with us. People tinkering with this stuff may discover the true coms route one day. Stop spreading your negativity. If its not for you, move along.
Not a rulemaking situation. I just ask what I consider logical questions about stuff I encounter, in an effort to get at the truth or understand things better.
E.g., Really, why stop at Q2629? Why NOT add up the digits and get 18, then scrutinize Q18; then add the 1 + 8 and check Q9, and try to relate them to the present day? How do you know when not to do that? What's the 'rule' being applied there? Is there any, or is it just arbitrary? These questions and the others seem sensible to ask.
I agree, no need for negativity. It's OK if answering those is not for you, move along. :)