Adding a post number to today's month, day, and year to get a new Q post number (602 + 4 + 2 + 2021 = 2629) is arbitrary.
Meaning, what stopped you from adding 2 + 6 + 2 + 9 and getting 18, then scrutinizing Q18; then adding the 1 + 8 and checking Q9?
Making a 6:16 video length into Q616 = arbitrary
What prevented adding 6 + 1 + 6 = 13, and stating that Q13 and Q4 refer to today?
And the zaniest arbitrary move of all: Divide 4/2/2021 = 0.000989 = Q989
Why not 9 + 8 + 9 = 26? Q26 and Q8!!
Or, how did you arbitrarily decide to divide instead of multiply?
After all, 4 x 2 x 2021 = 16,168. Adding those digits together (naturally!) produces 22. So: Q22 and Q4 are relevant to today!
Or, add those two! 22 + 4 = 26! Q 26 and Q8!
Or multiply them! 22 x 4 = 88! Oh NOOOOO! 88 = HH = Heil Hitler!!!! REEEE
And on and on. Creative and fun, but of little to no actual intel value IMHO
For those new to Q, there is no established practice or pattern of Q's posting behavior that follows any of these arbitrary rules that manipulate date/ time/ post number/ video length/ multiplication/ division/ addition/ subtraction.
The mental gymnastics for some of these time stamp + date / random number x 45 bullshit needs to stop.
Agreed. Of course some see this sentiment as "spreading negativity". As if spreading numerological nonsense is a form of positivity. Oh well, each to his own I guess
Don't forget the TZ stamp is different for people. I saw 3:02AM for the timestamp which invalidates the entire thing...again.
It's one thing to look for indications, it's another thing to snake oil people with distractions that are not logic or fact based. Yes, we all want something to happen, we're looking for actions/events that show progress. But using mystical math that would make an alchemist proud is pretty lame and good for nothing but wasting time. I'm at the point where i think we should simply nuke all new accounts from posting a thread for at least a month, comments sure, new threads double nope. They, for the most part are very divisive, distracting, and non-helpful to critical thinking. So many of these posts are of the same ilk as the bollocks of the two physicists that faked their data for room temperature fusion.
This is complete nonsense. All anyone has to do is follow the time stamp correlations with current events, since news verifies, over literally years to know you must be a shill.
Anyone who says timestamps are completely arbitrary has never actually looked consistently at the timestamps. After 50 times of seeing timestamps coordinating to the day, years in advance , with news and happenings you can’t argue with it.
False. Just asking what to me are logical questions about the process of deciding which mathematical operations to perform in order to arrive at Q post numbers, etc. Questions you can't answer, because dividing the month by the day by the year FFS is just people making up random stuff to fill up space with.
Just so you know...you aren't the only 'patriot for trump' here. Shills and glowies call me Trumptard, Drumphfwit, Trumplican, Qtard, and Qbot, to name just a few.
When did you become the rule maker? If adding a few numbers together makes people feel better why are you here trying to stop them? We don't know all the ways Q is trying to communicate with us. People tinkering with this stuff may discover the true coms route one day. Stop spreading your negativity. If its not for you, move along.
Not a rulemaking situation. I just ask what I consider logical questions about stuff I encounter, in an effort to get at the truth or understand things better.
E.g., Really, why stop at Q2629? Why NOT add up the digits and get 18, then scrutinize Q18; then add the 1 + 8 and check Q9, and try to relate them to the present day? How do you know when not to do that? What's the 'rule' being applied there? Is there any, or is it just arbitrary? These questions and the others seem sensible to ask.
I agree, no need for negativity. It's OK if answering those is not for you, move along. :)
Again with the timestamps and Q post numbers
Linking a 6:02 post time with Q602 = arbitrary
Adding a post number to today's month, day, and year to get a new Q post number (602 + 4 + 2 + 2021 = 2629) is arbitrary.
Meaning, what stopped you from adding 2 + 6 + 2 + 9 and getting 18, then scrutinizing Q18; then adding the 1 + 8 and checking Q9?
Making a 6:16 video length into Q616 = arbitrary
What prevented adding 6 + 1 + 6 = 13, and stating that Q13 and Q4 refer to today?
And the zaniest arbitrary move of all: Divide 4/2/2021 = 0.000989 = Q989
Why not 9 + 8 + 9 = 26? Q26 and Q8!!
Or, how did you arbitrarily decide to divide instead of multiply?
After all, 4 x 2 x 2021 = 16,168. Adding those digits together (naturally!) produces 22. So: Q22 and Q4 are relevant to today!
Or, add those two! 22 + 4 = 26! Q 26 and Q8!
Or multiply them! 22 x 4 = 88! Oh NOOOOO! 88 = HH = Heil Hitler!!!! REEEE
And on and on. Creative and fun, but of little to no actual intel value IMHO
For those new to Q, there is no established practice or pattern of Q's posting behavior that follows any of these arbitrary rules that manipulate date/ time/ post number/ video length/ multiplication/ division/ addition/ subtraction.
Exactly. Outside of odd numeric markers or timestamps with blatant symbolism (which there are very few of)... and even these are suspect.
The mental gymnastics for some of these time stamp + date / random number x 45 bullshit needs to stop.
I could do the same with a Teletubbies video on YouTube if I squinted with my brain hard enough.
If you squint with your brain you get more wrinkles.
Wrinkles = smart.
-> Squinting = good.
-> Watch teletubbies?
Q is a teletubbie. Change my mind.
Agreed. Of course some see this sentiment as "spreading negativity". As if spreading numerological nonsense is a form of positivity. Oh well, each to his own I guess
Don't forget the TZ stamp is different for people. I saw 3:02AM for the timestamp which invalidates the entire thing...again.
It's one thing to look for indications, it's another thing to snake oil people with distractions that are not logic or fact based. Yes, we all want something to happen, we're looking for actions/events that show progress. But using mystical math that would make an alchemist proud is pretty lame and good for nothing but wasting time. I'm at the point where i think we should simply nuke all new accounts from posting a thread for at least a month, comments sure, new threads double nope. They, for the most part are very divisive, distracting, and non-helpful to critical thinking. So many of these posts are of the same ilk as the bollocks of the two physicists that faked their data for room temperature fusion.
That’s a great idea ??
This is complete nonsense. All anyone has to do is follow the time stamp correlations with current events, since news verifies, over literally years to know you must be a shill.
Ive been watching his posts for awhile now. Definitely a shill.
Anyone who says timestamps are completely arbitrary has never actually looked consistently at the timestamps. After 50 times of seeing timestamps coordinating to the day, years in advance , with news and happenings you can’t argue with it.
Look at his name - thedogcomm. It's clear they're trying to make fools of as many people as possible.
False. Just asking what to me are logical questions about the process of deciding which mathematical operations to perform in order to arrive at Q post numbers, etc. Questions you can't answer, because dividing the month by the day by the year FFS is just people making up random stuff to fill up space with.
Just so you know...you aren't the only 'patriot for trump' here. Shills and glowies call me Trumptard, Drumphfwit, Trumplican, Qtard, and Qbot, to name just a few.
Nice. And now...a teletubbie!
989 has a nice delta at least.
Love me some delta :)
When did you become the rule maker? If adding a few numbers together makes people feel better why are you here trying to stop them? We don't know all the ways Q is trying to communicate with us. People tinkering with this stuff may discover the true coms route one day. Stop spreading your negativity. If its not for you, move along.
Not a rulemaking situation. I just ask what I consider logical questions about stuff I encounter, in an effort to get at the truth or understand things better.
E.g., Really, why stop at Q2629? Why NOT add up the digits and get 18, then scrutinize Q18; then add the 1 + 8 and check Q9, and try to relate them to the present day? How do you know when not to do that? What's the 'rule' being applied there? Is there any, or is it just arbitrary? These questions and the others seem sensible to ask.
I agree, no need for negativity. It's OK if answering those is not for you, move along. :)