The real problem here is these people are never going to stop because of what we say. We are France in the 1930s trying to placate Germany with words and treaties. They aren't going to listen to words. They only see might. The moment they view us as week enough they will attack. Everything else is designed to weaken us slowly but surely until they can take over... with violence.
Fight we can't win? If every red blooded American male age 16-50 banded together there would probibly be 20-40 million of us, and we are armed to the fucking teeth. Fight we can't win? The US military(which is barely 1 million strong) would fall in a matter days when faces with that sort of firepower. That's assuming half of them don't flip sides or simply walk away.
Your starting premise is utterly false. WE HAVE THE POWER. We just don't have to will to use it yet. The only thing that is required is for us all to act as one. Have you ever seen a lion get the shit kicked out of it by a herd of buffalo? I have. A whole pride of lions isn't shit when compared to 500 buffalo, but only if they all work together and go all in.
All we have to do is just collectively say NO MORE, and they would be defeated before the first bullet was fired.
I've written about this before and you're right... yet you're also wrong. When you're dealing with that many people no amount of organizing can prevent a breakdown of every key factor in winning a real war. The 2-5k people guarding an airbase like say Robbins in south GA could never ever possibly withstand the onslaught of 300k civilians simply flooding the area in say 24 hours. The base would be overrun in a matter of hours. You have any idea how deadly south GA rednecks are? 80% of them deer hunt regularly.
Sure you have tons of armor and troops just 1-200 miles away in Savannah, GA. They have to get there though. Through a swamp... filled with snipers. That's assuming they don't just park dozens of bulldozers and big rigs across the road at a river/bridge on I-16 and actually put up a real fight. Just a 24 hour delay and poof air support is gone because Robbins is already overrun and those fancy planes are burned wrecks on the runway. The fuel is gone. Hell now they have NUKES. Seriously the civilians now have nuclear bombs that they took from the B-52 air-wing.
That same scenario can be played out 30 times at other sets of bases. EVERYTHING works completely differently when you are literally fighting people within your own midst. There is no "front line". There are no supply lines. The military won't get replacement tanks. The guy that welded their tank together is the one shooting at them. There won't be replacement fuel. The dock workers and oil refinery workers are shooting at the military. The guy growing the corn and raising the chickens to make his MREs... yep he's shooting at them too.
Yeah, sure the military has stocks of ammo and fuel etc. How long you think that will last when half of it will be stolen or destroyed in the first few weeks. The US military has roughly a million combat troops. Even if you had zero casualties early on and used planes, artillery etc to kill tons of people lets say 5 million civilians. Now you're out of bombs, you're out of artillery ammo, you're out of fuel for the tanks etc etc... so now its 15-20 million REALLY pissed off civilians vs one million soldiers with battle rifles.
If you think being better organized is going to win a fight where its 20 vs 1 you've never been in combat. The US military wins fights with LOW casualty rates entirely because they use (some would say over use) air-power and artillery. If you remove those entirely from the equations at BEST one soldier is worth 2-3 civilians. None of this accounts for the tens of thousands of vets that are just as well trained. 15 vs 1? Nope they will get their ass kicked. The only question is how many people they kill in the process.
The only way the military wins is if they preemptively organize and attack the civilian population from surprise and are willing to slaughter MILLIONS of people in cold blood. I think we both know that isn't going to happen. Officer might try to order that but rank and file troops would frag the officers giving those orders. The reverse however is VERY possible. A sudden uprising triggered by an event that causes tens of thousands of civilians to overthrow the government. The moment the police or military fired on civilians word would spread like wildfire. Then it is no longer 200k its 30 million. Que above scenarios.
Here is the REAL truth. The mid level military officers... the Captains and Majors... they aren't stupid. They know they can't fight millions of armed US civilians. When the cabal owned generals tell them... Major turn that artillery to the north and hit grid XYZ. Kill that group of 10k civilians gathering to attack blah blah. That Major will laugh in his face. Then when that general pushes the point and threatens summary execution or court marshal etc... that major will draw his side arm and shoot the general for the traitor he is.
Why? Because its an illegal order. More importantly if he has half a brain he understand everything I've just laid out here. They can't win fighting their own civilian population on their own native soil. Thus its suicide to ever even start the fight. He's better off siding with the civilians. If half the military flips sides like this then its beyond unwinnable. Its 500k soldiers vs 500k soldiers with 20 million civilians backing them up.
Bottom line... if 20+ million civilians with nothing but ARs can't win then why are they so desperate to disarm us??? Because they know the truth. Taking on that massive a force is impossible unless they want to use nerve gas on them or nuke them.
Yes I do agree that it will take some sort of strong event to bring people together. However, just a decade ago even under Obama I would have had trouble seeing such an event happening. Short of him just refusing to give up POTUS etc it just wasn't there.
Today... heh... I can imagine dozens of scenarios where the rage bubble that has been building on the right won't just pop it will explode like a nuke. A perfect example is this trail of officer Chauvin with the George Floyd death happening right now. Just imagine if the jury convicts him of the worst crime listed and the judge gives him the max sentence or even more than the max. Imagine for a moment what it really means when everyone realizes something a few of us know already... justice is dead in the USA. Its not fair. Its not balanced. Trail by jury means nothing. Innocent until proven guilty is just a saying. It means nothing.
So what happens when just 5 or 10,000 people go up there guns in hand and demand he be let go. They demand justice. The next thing you know police are shooting civilians from armored cars. Hundreds dead, maybe thousands. Instead of the weak limp response given to BLM burning whole towns its a strong armed jack boot response. That simple little 10k will turn into 10 million over night. Every right leaning 16+ year old white male in this country will rise up all at once.
Imagine they arrest Trump on made up fake tax charges. They give him no bail and label him a flight risk. No trail. They just try to hold him and maybe even most of his family in a cell. Because they can.
Imagine they put Kyle Rittenhouse through a show trail, convict him, and sentence him to 20 to life? That's exactly what they did to the kid who drove his car into a crowd in Charlottesville, James Fields. I'm not saying he's innocent or guilty. I'm just saying if you really research that case there are a lot of things that don't add up. They got away with crushing him purely because there was some doubt about what happened. With Rittenhouse there is NO doubt. It was all on video. If they pull the same BS with him the response will be far different.
See that's the problem. The left is now so out of control they push the limits and walk that line closer and closer every single day. At this point its not a matter of if that event will happen its a matter of when. Its an inevitability. They just keep pushing and pushing. Something has to break. The rage bubble is as large as its ever going to be. At this point all that can happen is pressure builds up more and more, day by day. At some point that pressure will be too much and it will pop. Worse there is nothing re-leaving the pressure at all. There is no Trump building a wall. There is no YouTube guy that talks some sense into us all... he's been banned. Your favorite Twitter guy that used to make you laugh... yep banned. All that is left is anger at the banning, the censorship, the insane spending bills, the flood of people across the border, the tax hikes, the printing money.... on and on.
There are people on the left that believe right wing violence will be a good thing. It will give them an excuse to clamp down. That's not how it will work. When the rage bubble explodes it will be a human tidal wave. Critical mass is only in the hundreds of thousands. Why? Because the moment a single video gets onto the net showing police or military firing on civilians it will be the last straw for so many more to get involved. The act of "clamping down" will itself create the swell of support. That will be what fully pops the bubble.
Its already happened once, but people weren't quite ready. The reason for the violence was a little questionable as well. BLM has made several autonomous zones right, and no one did much of anything about it. Well the right did the exact same thing, and in the end several of them were gunned down in cold blood by law enforcement.
Find and watch the video of them stopping that guys truck. They just opened fire. These guys were a little out on a limb with there reasons and "cause" for doing what they did, but I think if the same thing happened tomorrow the right would lose its mind. Police just opening fire on people for no good reason yet the left does the exact same thing and no one stops them.
And you're wrong about the need for a "leader". When 10 million people act it will cause the rise of dozens of leaders. Yeah, it will be disorganized but in a state like GA where I live you have 10.5 million people. Its 59% white. So 30% white males. That's roughly 3 million people. Having 1 million of them rise up is not that huge of a stretch. Even if you divided them up into 20 small factions that's 50k people all going to one place... nothing will stand in their way for long. Even just 20k is a massive force. Its not hard to imagine that many pissed off people showing up if the right event sets them all off.
There is precedent for what I'm talking about. If they back people into a corner they will lash out. They just make a point of politely not mentioning things like the Bundy ranch standoff or...
Forget states for a moment apply simple math to the nation as a whole.
234,370,202 whites, so that's roughly 115 million males. If just 10% of them decide they've had enough of the anti-white BS that is 11.5 million people. Frankly there are plenty of non-whites that are royally pissed off too. Getting 20 million people to act isn't far fetched at all. Who is going to stop them? Seriously? Antifa? The police?
Military and police nationwide (fed, state, and local)combined make up about 2 million. That's assuming no one defects, etc. The numbers just aren't there. When people rise up, and they WILL rise up... there will be a simple choice... use belt fed weapons, artillery, bombs etc to slaughter thousands or get steam rolled. But that is flawed by the simple fact that the instant you drop one single bomb or fire one artillery round on US civilians on US soil you will inspire an extra 30 million people to join the fight, maybe 50 or even 100 million.
The only scenario where the cabal wins is one in which a real fight is never started. We give up our guns peacefully. Which seems unlikely.
Not trying to hope, but Realistically, the US military - historys most powerful organized force - haslost every war against disorganized random civilians it has ever been involved in.
Organized numbers just make it more decisive, but numbers always win.
Yeah. I thought that way too, once upon a time. Self defense only.
Then one fine day, I was on a combat search and rescue, and we found a shot down helo, just like what I flew in, Mekong Delta, wherein all four crew had been skinned, apparently before death.
From that point on, I never withheld machine gun fire. Ever. The next was at Hue City, 1968, where there were piles of civilians, South Vietnamese, murdered by the commies and set afire.
Violence is a tool used by both Good and Evil, one to protect, one to aggress. It is the tool you put at the very bottom of the toolbox. You learn to use it, and wish to never have to.
If you ever happen in the situation you run out of tools, you'll be happy it's there rather than not.
The real problem here is these people are never going to stop because of what we say. We are France in the 1930s trying to placate Germany with words and treaties. They aren't going to listen to words. They only see might. The moment they view us as week enough they will attack. Everything else is designed to weaken us slowly but surely until they can take over... with violence.
Fight we can't win? If every red blooded American male age 16-50 banded together there would probibly be 20-40 million of us, and we are armed to the fucking teeth. Fight we can't win? The US military(which is barely 1 million strong) would fall in a matter days when faces with that sort of firepower. That's assuming half of them don't flip sides or simply walk away.
Your starting premise is utterly false. WE HAVE THE POWER. We just don't have to will to use it yet. The only thing that is required is for us all to act as one. Have you ever seen a lion get the shit kicked out of it by a herd of buffalo? I have. A whole pride of lions isn't shit when compared to 500 buffalo, but only if they all work together and go all in.
All we have to do is just collectively say NO MORE, and they would be defeated before the first bullet was fired.
I've written about this before and you're right... yet you're also wrong. When you're dealing with that many people no amount of organizing can prevent a breakdown of every key factor in winning a real war. The 2-5k people guarding an airbase like say Robbins in south GA could never ever possibly withstand the onslaught of 300k civilians simply flooding the area in say 24 hours. The base would be overrun in a matter of hours. You have any idea how deadly south GA rednecks are? 80% of them deer hunt regularly.
Sure you have tons of armor and troops just 1-200 miles away in Savannah, GA. They have to get there though. Through a swamp... filled with snipers. That's assuming they don't just park dozens of bulldozers and big rigs across the road at a river/bridge on I-16 and actually put up a real fight. Just a 24 hour delay and poof air support is gone because Robbins is already overrun and those fancy planes are burned wrecks on the runway. The fuel is gone. Hell now they have NUKES. Seriously the civilians now have nuclear bombs that they took from the B-52 air-wing.
That same scenario can be played out 30 times at other sets of bases. EVERYTHING works completely differently when you are literally fighting people within your own midst. There is no "front line". There are no supply lines. The military won't get replacement tanks. The guy that welded their tank together is the one shooting at them. There won't be replacement fuel. The dock workers and oil refinery workers are shooting at the military. The guy growing the corn and raising the chickens to make his MREs... yep he's shooting at them too.
Yeah, sure the military has stocks of ammo and fuel etc. How long you think that will last when half of it will be stolen or destroyed in the first few weeks. The US military has roughly a million combat troops. Even if you had zero casualties early on and used planes, artillery etc to kill tons of people lets say 5 million civilians. Now you're out of bombs, you're out of artillery ammo, you're out of fuel for the tanks etc etc... so now its 15-20 million REALLY pissed off civilians vs one million soldiers with battle rifles.
If you think being better organized is going to win a fight where its 20 vs 1 you've never been in combat. The US military wins fights with LOW casualty rates entirely because they use (some would say over use) air-power and artillery. If you remove those entirely from the equations at BEST one soldier is worth 2-3 civilians. None of this accounts for the tens of thousands of vets that are just as well trained. 15 vs 1? Nope they will get their ass kicked. The only question is how many people they kill in the process.
The only way the military wins is if they preemptively organize and attack the civilian population from surprise and are willing to slaughter MILLIONS of people in cold blood. I think we both know that isn't going to happen. Officer might try to order that but rank and file troops would frag the officers giving those orders. The reverse however is VERY possible. A sudden uprising triggered by an event that causes tens of thousands of civilians to overthrow the government. The moment the police or military fired on civilians word would spread like wildfire. Then it is no longer 200k its 30 million. Que above scenarios.
Here is the REAL truth. The mid level military officers... the Captains and Majors... they aren't stupid. They know they can't fight millions of armed US civilians. When the cabal owned generals tell them... Major turn that artillery to the north and hit grid XYZ. Kill that group of 10k civilians gathering to attack blah blah. That Major will laugh in his face. Then when that general pushes the point and threatens summary execution or court marshal etc... that major will draw his side arm and shoot the general for the traitor he is.
Why? Because its an illegal order. More importantly if he has half a brain he understand everything I've just laid out here. They can't win fighting their own civilian population on their own native soil. Thus its suicide to ever even start the fight. He's better off siding with the civilians. If half the military flips sides like this then its beyond unwinnable. Its 500k soldiers vs 500k soldiers with 20 million civilians backing them up.
Bottom line... if 20+ million civilians with nothing but ARs can't win then why are they so desperate to disarm us??? Because they know the truth. Taking on that massive a force is impossible unless they want to use nerve gas on them or nuke them.
Yes I do agree that it will take some sort of strong event to bring people together. However, just a decade ago even under Obama I would have had trouble seeing such an event happening. Short of him just refusing to give up POTUS etc it just wasn't there.
Today... heh... I can imagine dozens of scenarios where the rage bubble that has been building on the right won't just pop it will explode like a nuke. A perfect example is this trail of officer Chauvin with the George Floyd death happening right now. Just imagine if the jury convicts him of the worst crime listed and the judge gives him the max sentence or even more than the max. Imagine for a moment what it really means when everyone realizes something a few of us know already... justice is dead in the USA. Its not fair. Its not balanced. Trail by jury means nothing. Innocent until proven guilty is just a saying. It means nothing.
So what happens when just 5 or 10,000 people go up there guns in hand and demand he be let go. They demand justice. The next thing you know police are shooting civilians from armored cars. Hundreds dead, maybe thousands. Instead of the weak limp response given to BLM burning whole towns its a strong armed jack boot response. That simple little 10k will turn into 10 million over night. Every right leaning 16+ year old white male in this country will rise up all at once.
Imagine they arrest Trump on made up fake tax charges. They give him no bail and label him a flight risk. No trail. They just try to hold him and maybe even most of his family in a cell. Because they can.
Imagine they put Kyle Rittenhouse through a show trail, convict him, and sentence him to 20 to life? That's exactly what they did to the kid who drove his car into a crowd in Charlottesville, James Fields. I'm not saying he's innocent or guilty. I'm just saying if you really research that case there are a lot of things that don't add up. They got away with crushing him purely because there was some doubt about what happened. With Rittenhouse there is NO doubt. It was all on video. If they pull the same BS with him the response will be far different.
See that's the problem. The left is now so out of control they push the limits and walk that line closer and closer every single day. At this point its not a matter of if that event will happen its a matter of when. Its an inevitability. They just keep pushing and pushing. Something has to break. The rage bubble is as large as its ever going to be. At this point all that can happen is pressure builds up more and more, day by day. At some point that pressure will be too much and it will pop. Worse there is nothing re-leaving the pressure at all. There is no Trump building a wall. There is no YouTube guy that talks some sense into us all... he's been banned. Your favorite Twitter guy that used to make you laugh... yep banned. All that is left is anger at the banning, the censorship, the insane spending bills, the flood of people across the border, the tax hikes, the printing money.... on and on.
There are people on the left that believe right wing violence will be a good thing. It will give them an excuse to clamp down. That's not how it will work. When the rage bubble explodes it will be a human tidal wave. Critical mass is only in the hundreds of thousands. Why? Because the moment a single video gets onto the net showing police or military firing on civilians it will be the last straw for so many more to get involved. The act of "clamping down" will itself create the swell of support. That will be what fully pops the bubble.
Its already happened once, but people weren't quite ready. The reason for the violence was a little questionable as well. BLM has made several autonomous zones right, and no one did much of anything about it. Well the right did the exact same thing, and in the end several of them were gunned down in cold blood by law enforcement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Malheur_National_Wildlife_Refuge
Find and watch the video of them stopping that guys truck. They just opened fire. These guys were a little out on a limb with there reasons and "cause" for doing what they did, but I think if the same thing happened tomorrow the right would lose its mind. Police just opening fire on people for no good reason yet the left does the exact same thing and no one stops them.
And you're wrong about the need for a "leader". When 10 million people act it will cause the rise of dozens of leaders. Yeah, it will be disorganized but in a state like GA where I live you have 10.5 million people. Its 59% white. So 30% white males. That's roughly 3 million people. Having 1 million of them rise up is not that huge of a stretch. Even if you divided them up into 20 small factions that's 50k people all going to one place... nothing will stand in their way for long. Even just 20k is a massive force. Its not hard to imagine that many pissed off people showing up if the right event sets them all off.
There is precedent for what I'm talking about. If they back people into a corner they will lash out. They just make a point of politely not mentioning things like the Bundy ranch standoff or...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Athens_(1946)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Race
Forget states for a moment apply simple math to the nation as a whole.
234,370,202 whites, so that's roughly 115 million males. If just 10% of them decide they've had enough of the anti-white BS that is 11.5 million people. Frankly there are plenty of non-whites that are royally pissed off too. Getting 20 million people to act isn't far fetched at all. Who is going to stop them? Seriously? Antifa? The police?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforcement_in_the_United_States#Police_population
Military and police nationwide (fed, state, and local)combined make up about 2 million. That's assuming no one defects, etc. The numbers just aren't there. When people rise up, and they WILL rise up... there will be a simple choice... use belt fed weapons, artillery, bombs etc to slaughter thousands or get steam rolled. But that is flawed by the simple fact that the instant you drop one single bomb or fire one artillery round on US civilians on US soil you will inspire an extra 30 million people to join the fight, maybe 50 or even 100 million.
The only scenario where the cabal wins is one in which a real fight is never started. We give up our guns peacefully. Which seems unlikely.
The odds are always in favor of the greater number
Even when totally disorganized
Not trying to hope, but Realistically, the US military - historys most powerful organized force - haslost every war against disorganized random civilians it has ever been involved in.
Organized numbers just make it more decisive, but numbers always win.
You're pretty sure the nazis were crushed and utterly defeated too.
Don't underestimate numbers. They A L W A Y S win. Not 100% of the time but 100% eventually, every time.
I wouldn't call executions "violent"
I wish violence on the most evil and corrupt. They deserve the full wrath of God, we SHOULD send them to judgment.
The unwillingness to do so is what lets them reach these levels of power and influence.
We've been weakened into believing violence is NEVER the answer, but righteous fury is fighting for our Lord, fighting Evil as He commands us to do.
The DS is what infected and manipulated the teachings to get Christians to become weak and never fight back as our Lord would have us do.
Yeah. I thought that way too, once upon a time. Self defense only. Then one fine day, I was on a combat search and rescue, and we found a shot down helo, just like what I flew in, Mekong Delta, wherein all four crew had been skinned, apparently before death.
From that point on, I never withheld machine gun fire. Ever. The next was at Hue City, 1968, where there were piles of civilians, South Vietnamese, murdered by the commies and set afire.
There ARE times when violence becomes necessary.
Violence isn't inherently evil.
Violence is a tool used by both Good and Evil, one to protect, one to aggress. It is the tool you put at the very bottom of the toolbox. You learn to use it, and wish to never have to.
If you ever happen in the situation you run out of tools, you'll be happy it's there rather than not.
i wish violence on those that initiate it on others as a means of coercion or for their own gratification.