Stephen Miller tweet with Trump
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
I zoomed in on the newspaper that is on Trump's desk in the photo that Stephen Miller tweeted.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i48c4QEa/anyone-take-a-close-look-at-toda/
The headline, title of the article and picture of the author both looked photoshopped in. You can see a gap in the title that is a different text and doesn't fit with the photo shopped words. I find what looked like the original article in the Wall Street Journal.
You can check it out here:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-post-pandemic-office-is-already-herein-australia-11617537601
I can't find any newspaper called "Personal Journal".
I'm not sure what "Offices Are Back... For Australia" is supposed to mean.
That Personal Journal page seems to have had issues in the past:
https://www.mediaite.com/print/wall-street-journal-editorial-board-blames-progressive-cancel-culture-for-employee-signed-letter-calling-out-opinion-section/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Wiki says Personal Journal publishes on:
"Personal Journal – published Tuesday through Thursday; covers personal investments, careers and cultural pursuits (the section was introduced April 9, 2002)"
Stephen Miller tweeted the photo at 5:34 am with the words, "Just had a terrific meeting with President Trump!" (he still calls him President Trump, not former President Trump?), yet the in the photo it's clearly late morning or late evening. The Personal Journal is only published Tuesday through Thursdays so I'd have to be published on April 6th. How could Miller tweet at 5:34 am on April 6th a photo that depicts late morning (or afternoon?) with an article that would not be published until that morning?
He may have met Trump as he said, but this is not a photo from that meeting. The photo was tweeted too early and it's clearly not 5:34 am in the photo. This photo also could not have been taken on April 6th.
My opinion is that the time of morning, time of the tweet, and "Personal Journal" are all meant to tell us that this photo is NOT from when Stephen Miller met Trump. The photo is to trick the enemy into thinking Trump and Miller met at Mar-A-Lago when the photo could NOT have been taken there on April 6th.
It's designed to fool us into thinking he met Trump at Mar-a-Lago, but gives away the truth if you read between the lines.
Anything we’re intended to find out, it’s presumed the enemy will find out too.
It may be a communication, but it’s not a trick... unless, of course, it was meant to trick us as well.
No, it seems to have fooled the low level ones pretty well. Maybe the higher ups won't be fooled, but the minions are 100% fooled. They're all focused on Trump's coke bottle and that Stephen Miller said "President Trump" and not "Former President Trump" (that one's really got them upset.
I'd say it tricked the NPCs pretty good.
Miller's tweet said this morning and the photo shows the wrong time of day for 5:34 am. So does that mean they actually met on April 5th when the article was published? Why is the headline photoshopped (you can see it overlays text). Is that to make the headline readable so it can be dated?
If you read further in the article you posted it says:
"In print, the coverage will be organized around four subject areas inside the A section Monday through Thursday: Mondays will focus on Careers & Leadership, incorporating regular contributions from Lynn Cook’s management team."
Career and Leadership topics are only published on Mondays.
On Tuesdays they publish:
"On Tuesdays, we’ll turn to Health & Wellness,"
The article is dated to April 4th. It could be an old paper, but the newspaper has some photoshopping on the article title and it's late morning (not 5:34 am). This can't be a photo of when Stephen Miller and Trump met. The newspaper, time of day and time of tweet tell us that.
Thanks for finding that article from 2002.
Isn't the phrase "hard candy" a code for something?
There is another detail I noticed. The Leftists are going ballistic in twitter's comments over Stephen Miller calling Trump "President Trump" and not "Former President Trump". I mean they are foaming at the mouth over that.
They're also rabid over Trump having a bottle of coke on his desk and a statue of himself on the other table.
Offices Are Back In Australia
(M)OAB
IA (Internal Affairs)
Just to clarify, that is OFFICES not OFFICERS
Nice catch! I didn't think about that.
Probably not correct at all, but im sure the paper means SOMETHING.
Hey sometimes those not correct ideas lead somewhere. It's great to just throw ideas out and see what catches. You never know.
Im good at that XD
Krithika Varagur is an award-winning American freelance journalist based in London after several years as a foreign correspondent in Indonesia. Her work focuses on religion and politics and has been published in The Guardian, The Atlantic, the Financial Times, the New York Review of Books, and more. She is currently writing her first book, on Saudi religious investments, for Columbia Global Reports. Her work has been supported by the Pulitzer Center, the International Women’s Media Foundation, International Reporting Project, the Rory Peck Trust, the Overseas Press Club, the Amtrak Writer Residency, and others. She graduated from Harvard University and is a Fulbright scholar. Her body of work includes an investigation into Ivanka Trump’s clothing factory in West Java, a report on the public caning of gay people in Aceh, a month-long reporting project on Buddhist communities in India, and a journey to the Indonesian spice island once traded for Manhattan.
Maybe it's about the journalist
She did write this book:
https://www.amazon.com/Call-Inside-Global-Religious-Project/dp/1733623760
Heres the link to teh article with the Author, Krithika Varagur , etc:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-post-pandemic-office-is-already-herein-australia-11617537601
Thanks!
yw
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/13/revealed-reality-of-a-life-working-in-an-ivanka-trump-clothing-factory
I don't think it's about the Ivanka article. I think it is about the fact that Krithika Varagur is in Australia.
The New York Review of Books takes a look at the doings and undoings in Krithika Varagur’s story “Pulling Down ‘the Wall of No’ on Police Reform in Minneapolis.” By contrast with the Star Tribune’s coverage of events, Varagur’s story is full of Black Lives Matter events and activists. With good reason, everyone in town is afraid of this crowd.
One other takeaway from Visagur’s article is that the state senate, under the control of a narrow Republican majority, is the sole remaining obstacle standing in the way of this crowd. That’s not the way Visagur puts it, of course, but the translation isn’t difficult.
Just a quick look and this is what I find about the author of the article.
Did you notice the part about Ivanka Trump Her body of work includes an investigation into Ivanka Trump’s clothing factory in West Java
Is that what the other article is about? I couldn't find it. Do you have the link? That would be awesome if you could share it.