Cheers mate, doesn't look like there's anything other than documents in here though? Maybe if I dig around in there some more... Not upset I can't see some fucked up shit, but I'm still a little morbidly curious
Having sex with teenagers of indeterminate age and identity in your hotel room may be sleazy, but it isn't "child-trafficking", let alone the prepubescent sort you go screaming about in CAPITAL LETTERS with your hair on fire. Depending on the legal age-of-consent where it occurred, it may not be illegal, even in the US (unless the camera recorded money changing hands). And even if he's guilty of skinning infants and wearing their faces, he's not JOE Biden. He's some bloke you never heard of before the election, wheeled out to intercept heat.
The whole laptop angle was titillating trash that we're supposed to waste our time on instead of more important issues, such as the missing president and his shifting moles, and where the stolen hundred trillion went and what if anything is being done to get it back.
There is no such thing as AI. Computers can't think and therefore are not intelligent. Just a bunch of transistors. They're actually quite dumb. Only do what they are told to do by some human.
So you know of a computer that doesn't need to be programmed? Never heard of that. How does it work?
Yeah, computers haven't changed. The transistor density is increasing. The clock cycle is increasing. The amount of memory available is increasing, but they still work the same.
Neural networks, in my opinion, aren't even close to the brain. It's basically an op amp, taking weighted inputs and generating an output. There's a feedback loop to modify the weights based on statistics. It's just another program. Don't get fooled by the fancy name. Computers still can't think.
"There was a curious rumor that one of the Q Team is either a sentient quantum AI or some advanced extraterrestrial lifeform / interdimensional being of light. If true, it may mean he/she/it/they come here to post and comment."
-Do you suppose they where here a quarter-century ago to post and comment about Monica Lewinsky so that all of Bill Clinton's real crimes could be starved out of consciousness for lack of attention?
Pure clickbait. Nothing about child-trafficking on either the tweet or the dailymail source.
"TheQStrategy" is a handshake bot account burying the board under hundreds of BS-laden posts per day. Deport them all.
Ok, but your post says the MSM admits the laptop is full of child trafficking evidence.
Be warned, its very graphic and traumatic content. Not fun to see.
Please point me to it. Ty
Cheers mate, doesn't look like there's anything other than documents in here though? Maybe if I dig around in there some more... Not upset I can't see some fucked up shit, but I'm still a little morbidly curious
DO NOT click that link!
Ty
"Are you new to the Internet?"
Having sex with teenagers of indeterminate age and identity in your hotel room may be sleazy, but it isn't "child-trafficking", let alone the prepubescent sort you go screaming about in CAPITAL LETTERS with your hair on fire. Depending on the legal age-of-consent where it occurred, it may not be illegal, even in the US (unless the camera recorded money changing hands). And even if he's guilty of skinning infants and wearing their faces, he's not JOE Biden. He's some bloke you never heard of before the election, wheeled out to intercept heat.
The whole laptop angle was titillating trash that we're supposed to waste our time on instead of more important issues, such as the missing president and his shifting moles, and where the stolen hundred trillion went and what if anything is being done to get it back.
I agree with your distinction vis a vis sex with minors vs traficking.
Ironically, that's what allegedly Gatez did and guess what they are calling it: child trafficking.
The laptop was the “October surprise” that would have sunk any politician in history ... and actually did, but didn’t somehow ...
That looks like the transcript of a dial-up connection.
The answer is: 17
There is no such thing as AI. Computers can't think and therefore are not intelligent. Just a bunch of transistors. They're actually quite dumb. Only do what they are told to do by some human.
A very accurate disruption of computers. In the 1970s.
I guess it's still accurate if you count "go learn how to do something yourself" as a human telling computers what to do.
So you know of a computer that doesn't need to be programmed? Never heard of that. How does it work?
Yeah, computers haven't changed. The transistor density is increasing. The clock cycle is increasing. The amount of memory available is increasing, but they still work the same.
We have neural networks that are based on the human brain (roughly) and can learn, create art, be creative, etc. That's just the public sector.
Neural networks, in my opinion, aren't even close to the brain. It's basically an op amp, taking weighted inputs and generating an output. There's a feedback loop to modify the weights based on statistics. It's just another program. Don't get fooled by the fancy name. Computers still can't think.
"There was a curious rumor that one of the Q Team is either a sentient quantum AI or some advanced extraterrestrial lifeform / interdimensional being of light. If true, it may mean he/she/it/they come here to post and comment."
-Do you suppose they where here a quarter-century ago to post and comment about Monica Lewinsky so that all of Bill Clinton's real crimes could be starved out of consciousness for lack of attention?
Hunter's laptop isn't DECLAS. It's DS misdirection.