Does mRNA vaccine permanently alter DNA?
(childrenshealthdefense.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
This is the first reputable data I've seen that cuts across the CDC narrative, and it passes the first-read sniff test! Though RFK Jr. sometimes pushes the meaning of a study a bit past its intent, in this case he seems to have a well-placed correspondent who has a right to raise concerns. This suggests the question is now officially open as to whether modRNA, being much more stable than human mRNA, has potential for reverse transcription into DNA at large. The secondary sources should be reviewed and understood and similar findings should be compiled for comparison. Autists need to get this together!
You really need to go to the full text.
This paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and as such there are some questions that remain unanswered and methods that may be flawed. I think overall it does lend support to other papers I have read on the subject though, which imply that our understanding of how the whole mechanism works is still incomplete. Again, I don't trust the certainty with which these medical specialists are claiming it is definitely safe. I think there are too many anomalies which suggest there may be other things happening that we don't yet understand.
However, the most interesting section in my opinion is the comments section.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full#disqus_thread
There are some good discussions about what they are reporting, and what they are not reporting, and the dangers of people misrepresenting the findings. Of course, there is the usual call of people claiming the entire paper should be censored because it is too "dangerous" to allow anti-vaxers to see this and misrepresent the results.
But there are at least as many people who are espousing the view that this cancel culture of genuine science is just as dangerous.
I'm in the control group.