Penultimate mask exposé. Censored on twatter. No media coverage. Stanford on masks
(www.sciencedirect.com)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Efficacy: "According to the current knowledge, the virus SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nm to 140 nm [nanometers (billionth of a meter)] [16], [17], while medical and non-medical facemasks’ thread diameter ranges from 55 µm to 440 µm [micrometers (one millionth of a meter), which is more than 1000 times larger [25]."
Useless: "meta-analysis found no protective effect of medical mask or N95 respirators against SARS virus"
Harmful: "Rebreathing contaminated air with high bacterial and toxic particle concentrations along with low O2 and high CO2 levels continuously challenge the body homeostasis, causing self-toxicity and immunosuppression"
Which is all why [they] want the world masked up.
That's a devastating paper. It's pretty comprehensive. I've bookmarked it and downloaded it. I can give it to mask people.
How is this the penultimate? What's next?
You beat me to it.
Whatever it takes.. this one is very comprehensive. Just a matter of time?
You should check out the other articles in there, too. LOADS of info
I will be hand-delivering this to our local health department and I will leave a few copies in the lobby of my office building... thanks for this.
Thank you! I linked to my reps (before it was deemed dangerous and blocked by twatter, hopefully one saw it..)
Also I was thinking about leaving a copy with the next store emp that asks me if I want a mask at the door..
Good idea...we need to really step up and do what we can to help.
Health Dept is a great idea!!!! I will be doing the same, and will be dripping one of at my city council's offices, the mayor's office, AND the Chamber of Commerce
Great read. Anyone else notice blatant spelling and grammatical errors ? Wth?
Yup. Author's primary language is not English. Also, this speaks about the journal's editorial staff.
I want to believe.
That being said, the following link examines (tries to "debunk") the referenced article:
https://www.amgenbiotechexperience.com/seeing-not-necessarily-believing
Thank you for this post!
does anyone have the unretracted version?