I'm guessing you didn't bother to read the ArmyTimes.com article that you linked to in your thread's title. You might want to go do that, since that article - apparently from our own U.S. Army - is CLEARLY a hit piece against General Mike Flynn. There are SEVERAL different derogatory statements/accusations made about Mike Flynn in this article.
The article even goes so far as to say: "There’s no indication Flynn shares his brother’s extreme views, and Flynn’s own career trajectory appears uninhibited by the relationship."
OP does not claim that this article is supportive of Charles Flynn or our cuase. It was provided as sauce reminding us that Flynn is in charge. It is not published by our military, but by Sightline Media Group, a privately owned company.
I'm guessing you didn't bother to read the ArmyTimes.com article that you linked to in your thread's title. You might want to go do that, since that article - apparently from our own U.S. Army - is CLEARLY a hit piece against General Mike Flynn. There are SEVERAL different derogatory statements/accusations made about Mike Flynn in this article.
The article even goes so far as to say: "There’s no indication Flynn shares his brother’s extreme views, and Flynn’s own career trajectory appears uninhibited by the relationship."
OP does not claim that this article is supportive of Charles Flynn or our cuase. It was provided as sauce reminding us that Flynn is in charge. It is not published by our military, but by Sightline Media Group, a privately owned company.
In charge of a total of 7,300 troops.
ya. its a smear piece. said he resigned after one month for lying about Russian involvement and being a qanon cult member.