Is Trump red pilling normies on vaccines?
(justthenews.com)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
I've been reflecting on Trump's stance on the vaccines. Right up until he left office he was clear - the vaccines were IF you wanted them, and therapeutics would be available too.
His 'promotion' of the vaccines has been, let's not forget, whilst he's been a civilian. It's a hunch, completely unprovable obviously, but after leaving office I doubt Trump will have been getting the constant advice and intelligence he was having, and also enjoying family time and normal life he wouldn't be attuned to stuff coming out on alt media anywhere near as much.
He made those two endorsements - one at CPAC, the other on the Fox interview - but, unless I've missed it, he hasn't really done it again the past two or three weeks. Now when I think about it, it's only been in the past two or three weeks that the adverse stories have started gradually breaking through the MSM firewall, so obviously he will be becoming aware of them now.
I think he was genuinely proud of his achievement. He may have been doing what he thought was right, even against 'top' (ie the 'plan') advice - at the end of the day, he is a family man and at that time in response to a 'pandemic' would have empathised with his voting base's concerns. And on this issue, he would have 'called the shots' - quite literally, aptly enough.
Now, I say 'top' meaning, DJT is a significant player in the Plan - but he's not the owner or the leader. This thing HAS to be so labyrinthe, so long and slow broiling in the making to work - I don't think even he is in on the most arcane elements of it.
He's smarter than that.
he never said he personally got the vaccine but you're right he said go ahead and get it if you want. I'd not define that as an endorsement but the media spins it how they wish to.
Yes, some good insights here on DJTs role. I have thought much the same for awhile now. Not the top...probably not ever, but a major chess piece.
Thanks! It was just my musings, I wanted to write them down whilst they were fresh in my mind.
The more I think about things, the more I realise they've tried this before and been foiled. SARS, swine flu, bird flu, all predicted to be catastrophic pandemics, all non-starters with jettisoned vaccines. And the common link with Neil Ferguson, SERCO, UK Crown. I can't help but think that this virus was intercepted and diluted, resulting in it yet again not being the pandemic they wanted. If I try and think logically, it would make more sense to have the devastating 'wipeout' first, as predicted each time, then for those left behind to be 'mopped up' by vaccines, which by then they'd be clamouring for.
If you think about the 16 year plan between OBASTURD and Killary, a pandemic that truly wipes out a ton of the world's population would have fitted in with the timeline of her second term, then killer vaccines could have finished the remainers off down to the required 500 million. Trump fucked the 16 year plan up by four years so, desperate times call for desperate measures you know, and they knew they needed cover for the election fraud to get him out by any means necessary, so the virus would be the 'last resort' even though it might have been compromised and thus not as effective as it needed to be (which it hasn't been). It makes sense when you think about the disparity between the narrative (prescripted, enacted prematurely thus no time to revise it) and the actual, this is the shittest pandemic that isn't ever. And hence, maybe these vaccines aren't the kill shots they had ready to go, but they've managed to contaminate a certain number of batches.
I 100% concur on the virus being neutralized.
I started going back to the posts as they become more revealing as time passes. It clearly states this was not about another 4 year election, but I admit I didn’t see the forest for the trees..and sometimes we were given so much information it was like drinking from a water-hose.
What do you think about Q references to CORONA OFFLINE in 2018. It was posted February 10, 2018 and four more posts that mention CORONA OFFLINE on August 30, 2018.
Also keeping in mind this “virus” was called the “Corona Virus” long before it was renamed Covid...another mystery of course.
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 No.325453 ? Feb 10 2018 05:30:58 (EST)
Seals are wonderful creatures.
Heard they work fast at capturing their prey.
PRAY.
Silence is golden.
CORONA_OFFLINE_Deac[0000].
Games R FUN!
Q
I 100% concur the virus was neutralized.
I started going back to reread the posts because they become more revealing as time passes. IE: “This was never about another 4 year election.” Most of us missed what this meant.
At the time the Q posts had so much information it felt like we were drinking from a water hose. There’s so much to review now that so much is coming to pass.
What is your opinion on the 2018 posts that talk about CORONA OFFLINE?
Keeping in mind that the virus was referred to as the CORONA VIRUS months before they renamed it Covid. And still this was more than a year before we knew about any virus at all.
Below is the post from February 10, 2018.
There are also four posts on the date of August 30, 2018 that mention the same CORONA OFFLINE.
What is your speculation on this?
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 567809 No.325453 ?
Feb 10 2018 05:30:58 (EST)
Seals are wonderful creatures.
Heard they work fast at capturing their prey.
PRAY.
Silence is golden.
CORONA_OFFLINE_Deac[0000].
Games R FUN!
Q
Slings and arrows
Doubtful. President Trump has made too much of an effort to take credit for the vaccines to try to change his stance. And if there is a problem with the vaccines you know he will get blamed.
"rare" blood clots