There may be a problem with if it’s admissible, though. Depends on the state where the filming occurred. If it’s a two party consent state, and CNN man didn’t consent to the taping, the court can’t admit it as evidence.
He's already a rich man, I thought. Maybe he'll be richer, or just able to spend the money on shark lawyers to completely bury CNN. Either way, a win for the good people!
Lol bruh CNN is literally on video/audio admitting to pushing pure propaganda, did we already know this? Yeah sure but wait until everyone else catches wind of this, CNN is done for.
How is this news? Help me out here.
There may be a problem with if it’s admissible, though. Depends on the state where the filming occurred. If it’s a two party consent state, and CNN man didn’t consent to the taping, the court can’t admit it as evidence.
intentionally smearing a politician for your own corrupt gains... is that treason?
He's already a rich man, I thought. Maybe he'll be richer, or just able to spend the money on shark lawyers to completely bury CNN. Either way, a win for the good people!
Have you seen it admitted on camera before?
^ this guy has a point ^
Acorn was shut down, or defunded by Congress ... but they may be back again ?
Lol bruh CNN is literally on video/audio admitting to pushing pure propaganda, did we already know this? Yeah sure but wait until everyone else catches wind of this, CNN is done for.