Get your ass in a glider and tell me the curvature of the earth is false. Seen it myself.
Flat earth dismisses gravity as a force, and then tries to use density calculations to explain why things fall. funnily enough density calcs rely on the constant acceleration of gravity being what it is to work.
Ive wasted more than enough brain space over thr past 5 years debating flat earthers. None of them know what must be explained for their theory to work:
Seasons
Why things sink
How planets move in the sky
How the greeks thousands of years ago worked out with shadows and a well the shape and relative mass of earth with alarming accuracy for the time.
Why day and night happen and why the time changes
It being colder in the north and south, but not the equator.
Meteors
Comets and their shape and trajectories
Phases of the moon and its orbits
If you can explain all that logically without gravity and a round earth, ill eat my white hat.
I'm not saying it's flat but the bottom line is that most scientists who taught us about space have sworn to Satan to deceive humanity... pretty sure their work gets an asterisk lmao
There's literally a million theoretical explanations for everything you listed aside from "the earth is a spinning ball flying a million mph around a sun"
And ill listen to any that can explain observed evidence and data from centuries of experiments that return consistent results. Until then, I'll continue to dismiss FET as CIA agitprop to discredit "conspiracy discovery" in general. I've yet to see anything to say it isn't.
Fyi - ill admit we still don't get gravity as a force. Quantum gravity research is a hot topic in physics. However, we do know planetary motion very well, and satellites rely on that info being true. We learned the reality of speed and how it affects the passing of time as a result as well.
The cabal did its best to claim the science proposed by Galileo was heresy, but it doesn't change the reality of what you can see in a telescope. Copernicus wouldn't publish his findings until after he died for fear of the cabal of his time (mostly the catholic church then).
You have to look at who was who, when they lived, to make any judgement based on trustworthiness, and these are well documented individuals who lived it. And given most of those names are now being muddied for the simple reason of "white old men", i think its safe to rely on their findings for now.
Flat earth theory is a cia psyop. There, i said it.
If you support a cia psyop, what's that make ya bro?
Whatever the truth is... we currently don't have it bro
Get your ass in a glider and tell me the curvature of the earth is false. Seen it myself.
Flat earth dismisses gravity as a force, and then tries to use density calculations to explain why things fall. funnily enough density calcs rely on the constant acceleration of gravity being what it is to work.
Ive wasted more than enough brain space over thr past 5 years debating flat earthers. None of them know what must be explained for their theory to work:
If you can explain all that logically without gravity and a round earth, ill eat my white hat.
I'm not saying it's flat but the bottom line is that most scientists who taught us about space have sworn to Satan to deceive humanity... pretty sure their work gets an asterisk lmao
There's literally a million theoretical explanations for everything you listed aside from "the earth is a spinning ball flying a million mph around a sun"
And ill listen to any that can explain observed evidence and data from centuries of experiments that return consistent results. Until then, I'll continue to dismiss FET as CIA agitprop to discredit "conspiracy discovery" in general. I've yet to see anything to say it isn't.
Fyi - ill admit we still don't get gravity as a force. Quantum gravity research is a hot topic in physics. However, we do know planetary motion very well, and satellites rely on that info being true. We learned the reality of speed and how it affects the passing of time as a result as well.
The cabal did its best to claim the science proposed by Galileo was heresy, but it doesn't change the reality of what you can see in a telescope. Copernicus wouldn't publish his findings until after he died for fear of the cabal of his time (mostly the catholic church then).
You have to look at who was who, when they lived, to make any judgement based on trustworthiness, and these are well documented individuals who lived it. And given most of those names are now being muddied for the simple reason of "white old men", i think its safe to rely on their findings for now.
'It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out.'