Hindu culture has no chronology to any claims from antiquity, therefore it can be assumed, absent concrete claims, that Hebrew claims, which contain a genealogy, are more likely to go back farther.
The knowledge and stories written in in books in the language of Sanskrit were not created when the people living India finally gained access to paper and pen. Those histories and stories were passed down orally for thousands of years before the invention of books and you have no idea how many thousands that could’ve been.
The intertwined snakes is a newer version of the Hebraic symbol/sign for healing from a plague that God sent to punish the Israelites’ disobedience.
How do you explain the existence of the caduceus in Hindu culture?
I don’t think the Bible was ever a really popular book in India.
We must go back further into history to understand the origins of many of these ancient symbols.
Hindu culture has no chronology to any claims from antiquity, therefore it can be assumed, absent concrete claims, that Hebrew claims, which contain a genealogy, are more likely to go back farther.
Ha ha ha ha....
The knowledge and stories written in in books in the language of Sanskrit were not created when the people living India finally gained access to paper and pen. Those histories and stories were passed down orally for thousands of years before the invention of books and you have no idea how many thousands that could’ve been.
And neither do you
and their poor record keeping is a testimony to the lack of validity to any claims they make about having done something first