Much easier. Scientists get paid by sponsors of their research projects and get promoted by getting more funding/projects/sponsors. Sponsors only sponsor research in which they have vested interest in, and desire a particular outcome.
The scientists that succeed produce the results their sponsors desire.
It’s easier and cheaper. You get to pick your scientist from the get go, based on their ideas and public stance, and it’s an unwritten rule that your findings better match your hypothesis otherwise the funding dries up. No one wants to pay for a scientist with a track record of failed hypotheses and ‘unsuccessful’ experiments.
My son is a PHD candidate in Biology of some sort. This is TRUE. I've watched it happen. Go against the narrative & the grants dry up or they get no / bad peer reviews, get a reputation, can't finish, etc. From his start of his masters to now has been a down hill run. He went in a Patriot, is now a left wing nut job. We don't speak. It sucks. I wish he would have went to work as a farm hand w/ no education rather than this. They ruined him, and he went along.
It's a shame too, becuase the scientific method is how things should be done. It really is brilliant and I have respect for those that truly practice it, but funding is ever a difficulty for a scientific program, and those willing to fund them usually do have a narrative to push or a desired profitable outcome.
....and a whole lot CHEAPER too!
I'd say easier. They are like franchise snake oil salesmen.
Much easier. Scientists get paid by sponsors of their research projects and get promoted by getting more funding/projects/sponsors. Sponsors only sponsor research in which they have vested interest in, and desire a particular outcome.
The scientists that succeed produce the results their sponsors desire.
It’s easier and cheaper. You get to pick your scientist from the get go, based on their ideas and public stance, and it’s an unwritten rule that your findings better match your hypothesis otherwise the funding dries up. No one wants to pay for a scientist with a track record of failed hypotheses and ‘unsuccessful’ experiments.
Grad students will do it for free
How do you think the scientists actually conduct their research?
Doctors too.
I've only known one doctor who would not allow pharmaceutical reps to visit his office with their wares. Great doc, now retired.
Teachers...
I'm a teacher. Based af! Not gonna indoctrinate me. In fact, my studies made me more based.
My son is a PHD candidate in Biology of some sort. This is TRUE. I've watched it happen. Go against the narrative & the grants dry up or they get no / bad peer reviews, get a reputation, can't finish, etc. From his start of his masters to now has been a down hill run. He went in a Patriot, is now a left wing nut job. We don't speak. It sucks. I wish he would have went to work as a farm hand w/ no education rather than this. They ruined him, and he went along.
It's a shame too, becuase the scientific method is how things should be done. It really is brilliant and I have respect for those that truly practice it, but funding is ever a difficulty for a scientific program, and those willing to fund them usually do have a narrative to push or a desired profitable outcome.
Who are you to be so wise in the ways of science?
About 9,000,000 a year and yet Fauci won't answer one question for us.
They are both Satan's priest.
Truth!
Who's the girl? She's hot.
And their egos are just as big.
Soldier quit using this meme format wrong!
This is for 2 columns of tally marks.
You should have used the Lisa Simpson presentation meme.
Is she for sale as well? Wearing a A"HO"Y hat.