Judge Orders New Election After 78 Percent of Mail-In Ballots Found Invalid, Notary Arrested
Since you need a subscription to read this, I'm pasting the full article below.
A Mississippi judge ordered a new runoff election for a local election in Aberdeen after more than three-quarters of absentee ballots cast in the June Democratic runoff election were found to be invalid, while a notary involved in the election was arrested.
Judge Jeff Weill, in a 64-page order, said that there is evidence of fraud and criminal activity in how absentee ballots were handled, how they were counted, and actions from individuals at polling places during the runoff election held in Aberdeen, Mississippi. As a result, a new runoff election for the Ward 1 alderman seat is necessary, reported WCBI.
The judge ruled that 66 of 84 absentee ballots that were cast in the election, or around 78 percent, should have never been counted, according to WCBI. Nicholas Holliday was declared the winner of the alderman seat by 37 votes, while challenger Robert Devaull contested the results in court.
“The court is of the opinion there is probable cause that several individuals involved in the disturbances during election day at the polling precinct ‘willfully and corruptly violated’ one or more of the above criminal statutes,” according to the judge.
“The court will leave to the appropriate authorities to determine whether the actions of Maurice Howard, Henry Randle and S. Nicholas Holliday amounted to prosecutable crimes,” the court filings also said, referring to Police Chief Henry Randle and former Mayor Maurice Howard, who Weill said were involved in intimidation and harassment at the polling police on Election Day, according to evidence.
Meanwhile, Weill ordered a separate bench warrant and set bond for $500 for Dallas Jones, who notarized the absentee ballots in question, reported the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal. She was later released on bond, reports said. According to court documents, Jones said she admitted that she violated her notary duties and allegedly said she assisted an individual or individuals that flaunted the state’s voter fraud law.
Jones testified in a hearing that she was called to the home of then Alderwoman Lady Garth to correct the woman’s father’s absentee ballot paperwork. Jones said she notarized “about 30 something ballots,” WCBI reported, adding that the judge found that 83 regular ballots were counted without being initialed by election workers.
The court filings said that another notary, Lu Stephens, made testimony that was determined not to be believable, according to the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal. The judge noted that other irregularities were noted, including ballot box integrity and not certifying the election in a timely manner.
“When you have an absentee ballot, there’s an envelope, you vote, fold the ballot, put it in an envelope, lick the flap, sign across the flap, then notary signs your election certificate, she testified that she didn’t sign in front of anybody, didn’t see anybody sign it, she just notarized it, just stamped them,” said Lydia Quarles, an attorney for Robert Devaull, told WCBI.
An attorney for Holliday told WCBI that they “will explore all the legal remedies afforded to Mr. Holliday under the law including but not limited to a request for the Court to reconsider its findings; a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or new trial; or the appellate process.”
Still good news!
Yep. So not a biggie unfortunately.
The site needs to filter out posters with misleading information. This is old news. Hold a poll to either change the title or be discarded. Also warn the poster that spreading misleading information (a biggie) will lead to restrictions. Don't let shills contaminate the site.
I know. Because it's a huge deal to read a news article that has passed its freshness date. Usually, if I see an old article, I say to myself "that article is old" and then I continue on with my life. It's pretty cool how well it works.
OP probably did it in good faith and didn’t check the date but I agree that checking dates and facts are basic requirements.
Yeah, but it is a precedent in law with a remedy.
Yes. It's one more "straw on the camel's back."
There are already a lot of them, and there will be a lot more....
This is YUGE!! Sets a precedent for overturning a rigged election.
The snowball of justice is now rolling. Watch as it picks up mass (other cases) and speed (news coverage)!
Why are you putting fire and "biggie" on a month old news article??
It was good news, hopefully it will amount to something beyond whatever happened with it the last month.
You didn't notice the date, I assume, right?
March 4, 2021 Updated: March 4, 2021
Probably a good article to send to people who sat there is no proof of voter fraud.
So it’s over a month old, what became of it?
Thanks for posting this!
Isn’t Dallas Jones the person Sidney Powell mentioned would be arrested months ago?
Everything thought it was the Dallas Jones from Texas who was in charge of Biden’s Texas campaign at the time.
Okay this happened a month ago... is it real? What happened with it? Has there been a new election since?
get this judge a security detail asap. Brave man!
Great but um, Alderman for a town I never heard of in a state that's far far away, & no official is even going to jail yet....... Dozens of fraudulent votes done the old fashioned way. What about the sheer millions manipulated by computers in China? This gives me more dismay than hope
I think the major take from this is that it sets a precedent. Other judges in other local cases, after seeing it done, may not balk at issuing a similar decision in their cases, and eventually may be precedent for the state and national fraud cases. We have no good precedents for when it is shown beyond where reasonable people can deny that we inaugurated the wrong man into office.
Stuff this small has surely happened before
Now the red pilled are alert to election fraud and are more easily noticing these cases.
youre a smart dude
Rich by common "cents" standards though!