Look at this (circle) graph, update 4-16-21
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Weekly update:
Another 250+ deaths last week. Reported Covid Vaccine deaths stand at 20% of all reported vaccine deaths since CDC implemented the VAERS (vaccine adverse event reporting system).
Have fun digging through the data https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
Can someone much smarter than me answer this... The CDC list zero deaths associated with the vaccines. But VAERS has around 1,300 ish.
Are the deaths listed in VAERS unrecognized? Why? Can we reasonably assume that they are still investigating?
VAERS website states these are ‘reports’ and not verified. Some journalists have been seeking responses from the cdc regarding what they are doing to verify, so far no response from cdc
"They" are killing people.
2,470 deaths reported using an under-utilized reporting system. Over 1,900 of those deaths were ages 65+.
We're not supposed to hate these people but they make it so easy to do. God help me.
It could be underreported or overreported. You can read each individual case at vaers. IMHO about half the cases I read were not clearly linked to the vaccine (kind of like covid deaths). Someone in hospice, stage 4 cancer, dies a week after the jab.
I also assume there is underreporting due to the high level of ‘buy in’ that this is the safest vaccine ever.
It’s hard to know. It’s the best/only data source we have and it looks pretty devestating to me.
Agreed. Especially for seniors.
To be fair, VAERS reports were determined to be monstrously underreported previously. I think that has changed for this vaccine. While it is still likely underreported, it is almost certainly not underreported by the 100 times it was before. If it was, every single person in the world would know someone who died from the vaccine.
In other words this data could be from a more deadly vaccine, or it could be from a change in percentage of reports. It could be both (most likely imo). Regardless, this data is almost certainly not a good set for analysis or meaningful conclusion.
While I agree with most of your assertions, do you have a better dataset to use?
I'm not saying don't use it at all. I just think it can't be compared to previous years with making these essential stipulations.
The real conclusions to take away from this are:
The last is very interesting to me. Why would these reports increase? What measures were taken to increase the numbers? Who would want people to see how deadly they are? Who is really in control?
I can’t find any reference to changes in reporting protocols on the vaers website. I assumed there was a change, but can’t find it.
My oppinion is that reporting has increased due to the hightened awareness, but I don’t know how much.
I also was unable to find changes in reporting protocols. I will admit my search was not as thorough as it could have been though (don't care that much/too much shit to do).
This may well be the case, but we also almost certainly have Patriots who are actively trying to wake people up. Increasing vaccine reports would do that, so it's difficult to think they aren't actively engaged in this.