This actually doesn't sound like good news at all. He goes on to say that you're just as likely to catch COVID at 60 feet as you are at 6 feet. He also says clearly that masks work in the article, but that you should focus on other things besides social distancing and masks when indoors, like the air flow in the building. He said, "This is why time spent in the enclosed area is more important than how far you are from the infected person."
Also, he's saying the six foot rule makes no sense but then makes this assertion without any evidence:
"Crowded spaces outdoor could be an issue, but if people are keeping a reasonable distance of like 3 feet outside, I feel pretty comfortable with that even without masks frankly."
Don't get me wrong. I think masks and distancing are pointless, but this article doesn't completely agree.
Yes. I read the whole thing and while some things are encouraging, much of the article is pushing for mask wearing, claiming they work and that too much time inside is likely to spread covid regardless if you're 6 or 60 feet. I think people didn't read it at all and just commented.
"The majority of people who are transmitting Covid aren’t coughing and sneezing, they’re asymptomatic." then “We need scientific information conveyed to the public in a way that is not just fearmongering but is actually based in analysis,” I've read asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare, and yet they're stocking the fear themselves, yet again, and claim not too. Either that; it's poorly written; or they don't know what message or information they want to convey.
This isn't news. CV has been a total hoax right from the start.
But now it's being reported on a MSM site, so that's good news.
This actually doesn't sound like good news at all. He goes on to say that you're just as likely to catch COVID at 60 feet as you are at 6 feet. He also says clearly that masks work in the article, but that you should focus on other things besides social distancing and masks when indoors, like the air flow in the building. He said, "This is why time spent in the enclosed area is more important than how far you are from the infected person."
Also, he's saying the six foot rule makes no sense but then makes this assertion without any evidence:
"Crowded spaces outdoor could be an issue, but if people are keeping a reasonable distance of like 3 feet outside, I feel pretty comfortable with that even without masks frankly."
Don't get me wrong. I think masks and distancing are pointless, but this article doesn't completely agree.
Yes. I read the whole thing and while some things are encouraging, much of the article is pushing for mask wearing, claiming they work and that too much time inside is likely to spread covid regardless if you're 6 or 60 feet. I think people didn't read it at all and just commented.
We have to be careful with the misleading headlines.
"The majority of people who are transmitting Covid aren’t coughing and sneezing, they’re asymptomatic." then “We need scientific information conveyed to the public in a way that is not just fearmongering but is actually based in analysis,” I've read asymptomatic transmission is extremely rare, and yet they're stocking the fear themselves, yet again, and claim not too. Either that; it's poorly written; or they don't know what message or information they want to convey.
Am I missing something or is the main stream media, in this article, actually presenting something factual? I must be dreaming…
In before MIT is defamed just like anyone else that speaks against the narrative
Yuck why is this an apple link
Well these morons are usually 3 months behind us. so....good news in July!
Shanghai shivers !