Reading the posts is completely insufficient. Q is not a story, but a training manual for investigation. Answering the questions is WAY more important than reading the posts.
Having said that, to suggest that all commenters need to be Q experts is ridiculous. Having discussions brings learning to the underknowledged as well as the expert involved in the discussion..
Oh hey guys. Talking shill here. Qanon's first post said Hillary would be arrested on such and such day. I hate to break it to you but she's not in prison guys. I totally deboinked the Q conspiracy...
Me screaming at screen
Q NEVER SAID THAT YOU STUPID FUCKS. LEARN HOW QUOTES ON IMAGE BOARDS WORK!
What's more how do they know they didn't arrest her on that date? I'm not suggesting clones or anything more strange, but it's not uncommon for people in major investigations to be brought into custody and then released, or interrogated, or tracked, etc.
Realistically, if they had arrested her, but weren't prepared to publicize the state of affairs, they'd do their best to make it look like she wasn't.
It's too ambiguous to utilize as a counter-proof. If anything, the greatest Q criticism is the ambiguity. Realistically, the only reason I put any salt to it is because there are so many instances in which future has proven past.
Reading the posts is completely insufficient. Q is not a story, but a training manual for investigation. Answering the questions is WAY more important than reading the posts.
Having said that, to suggest that all commenters need to be Q experts is ridiculous. Having discussions brings learning to the underknowledged as well as the expert involved in the discussion..
Them
Me screaming at screen
What's more how do they know they didn't arrest her on that date? I'm not suggesting clones or anything more strange, but it's not uncommon for people in major investigations to be brought into custody and then released, or interrogated, or tracked, etc.
Realistically, if they had arrested her, but weren't prepared to publicize the state of affairs, they'd do their best to make it look like she wasn't.
It's too ambiguous to utilize as a counter-proof. If anything, the greatest Q criticism is the ambiguity. Realistically, the only reason I put any salt to it is because there are so many instances in which future has proven past.
https://qanon.pub/#1
That's a quote. It's in a box. That's how quotes appear when you reply to a post and quote the original poster on most image boards.
Oh. I hadn't seen that.