Watermarks or fingerprints?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Former leo.
This is simply not true.
UV isn't for oil. It can be used for "watermarks" but not the old school style on currency. There are certain pigments that react to UV and glow flourescent.
Some of these are actually ALSO used on currency, as there are multiple types of anti-forgery techniques employed.
It makes zero sense to look for fingerprints on ballots that are handled by multiple people prior to being tabulated..
And if they were looking for prints, old school black powder still works best, is fast and effective.
PM claiming that there is no evidence the ballots had watermarks proves hes a shill or misinformed.
Even printers can create a nearly invisible dot pattern as a "watermark" as a signature as to what machine printed a document.
Edit:
A more logical reason uv is being used is to DISINFECT each document in case of any contamination. Viral, etc.
Other than that, it's to detect phosphor type chemicals. Ie: semen (unlikely), reactive pigments (likely)
Absolutely correct. A US Passport has many anti forgery markings that are only visible under UV light. Use to work at DMV and all employees had to have anti forgery training.
Paying medic didn’t even charge for that?
Payme Medic... you mean?
Touché
Lol exactly
This is the most retarded claim ever. ALL THE WORKERS in AZ right now are handling the ballots with their bare hands... so how are they going to be able to differentiate between their oil and "oil" from Election Day. And the Arizona Audit doesn't have an official Telegram account.
Praying Medic's post is sus.
ooooooooo....
more disinformation to mix with the rumor and innuendo !!!
just be patient, pedes... lol
NCSWIC
Different type of watermark. They said UV ink...seen using UV lights. Much like the stamps they stamp your hand with when you want to go to your car at like an amusement park and you put it under a light when you go back in.
Interesting so this dude in the video https://streamable.com/y4tyzj was he supposed to have been using a IV light or not? I'm just trying to make sense of all this stuff here.
But I think we got shills in here trying to stir up information so we end up wasting are time on what isn't fact. Either way I guess we have to learn by what's happening here and go with that...
Just had a thought maybe they need to check for both who knows?
But UV light can be used to detect fake watermarks.
A black light to find fraud. That’s racist.
Idk, they sometimes use these light readers to check for counterfeit currency in shops here. The oil thing makes no sense to me.
Then why use a black light at all? Rrrrreeeeeeeeee
This is dumb, but I'll upvote it anyways so that others might read the comment for the truth.