This is a forensic audit. I don't think they saw this coming.
They are checking for physical signs of a real ballot. Is it folded in the right way. Is it folded TOO perfect. Has it been handled by human hands. Was it marked in by human hands. Is there a water mark that no one knew existed. Other things I am sure haven't been advertised.
I do not think they had to time to fix half a million or more ballots that didn't fit into one or more of these categories, especially if they didn't know exactly what tests they would do.
A "Hey trump said that there are watermarks on the ballots. W-we should reprint all the ballots with watermarks so as to not to get caught with fraud."
B "Awww yeah, good catch lets do that right now. Like... but, what do they, you know the water ballots, sorry watermarks look like?"
I feel that’s a good point but part of this watermark narrative—this came out back in November—was that outsiders were brought in to assist with this measure. If you search for Steve Piecenzik (he discussed this with someone on Alex Jones show) Trump brought him and a few others into the fold to set up a sting operation.
Intelligence. There's a good chance that the conceited Dems didn't think the watermarks were real. To my knowledge the watermark thing came from the Q community. As a result the DS and MSM probably didn't take it seriously.
Data is raw information, intelligence is organized information and knowledgeable is information acted upon. They had the data. They poorly lumped the data together into the conspiracy pile and moved on. To be fair to them it's wise to look at other, more likely scenarios and go based off of that. You should never discount periphery analysis and come up with contingencies.
Lets look at what had to happen for them to fabricate ballots. They would have needed to give China information about the ballots. It's possible that they gave China and nations that printed the ballots samples of older ballots because they didn't think the watermarks were real they probably didn't look for watermarked ballots to send to China.
I think these people operate in corporate board room situations. If they higher ups say it's a dumb idea then they don't go through with it. If the data says it's statistically impossible then it's not looked at. It's very simple and liner thinking. You can't always think simply when running a nation or conducting a military. You can for a business but even then the more creative you are the more it pays off. Some of the greatest battles in history were won because someone decided to exploit an opportunity no one else would. The Siege of Tyre by Alexander the Great is a good example of this. They didn't think he was crazy enough to stick with building a land bridge. When he did they had no contingencies. The Hessians didn't expect the Patriots to cross the Delaware but through faith and skill they did. To quote Sun Tzu;
"To perceive victory when it is known to all is not really skilful... It does not take much strength to lift a hair, it does not take sharp eyes to see the sun and moon, it does not take sharp ears to hear the thunderclap."
I think that nobody (either side) saw this Jovan Pulitzer guy coming. If you had a blank paper and could write down any skill set that you would want in a person coming to help you in an election fraud situation, you couldn't ask for much more than what's in this Jovan package. Brilliant, independently wealthy, passionate for his side and having tons of previous experience in ballot investigations. What kind of luck has fallen upon us? Unbelievable. Feeling good about this state, so far.
This is a forensic audit. I don't think they saw this coming.
They are checking for physical signs of a real ballot. Is it folded in the right way. Is it folded TOO perfect. Has it been handled by human hands. Was it marked in by human hands. Is there a water mark that no one knew existed. Other things I am sure haven't been advertised.
I do not think they had to time to fix half a million or more ballots that didn't fit into one or more of these categories, especially if they didn't know exactly what tests they would do.
A "Hey trump said that there are watermarks on the ballots. W-we should reprint all the ballots with watermarks so as to not to get caught with fraud."
B "Awww yeah, good catch lets do that right now. Like... but, what do they, you know the water ballots, sorry watermarks look like?"
A "Ummmmmmmmm"
I feel that’s a good point but part of this watermark narrative—this came out back in November—was that outsiders were brought in to assist with this measure. If you search for Steve Piecenzik (he discussed this with someone on Alex Jones show) Trump brought him and a few others into the fold to set up a sting operation.
Here’s an article link, but there’s a video too on banned.video: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/290758
Intelligence. There's a good chance that the conceited Dems didn't think the watermarks were real. To my knowledge the watermark thing came from the Q community. As a result the DS and MSM probably didn't take it seriously.
Data is raw information, intelligence is organized information and knowledgeable is information acted upon. They had the data. They poorly lumped the data together into the conspiracy pile and moved on. To be fair to them it's wise to look at other, more likely scenarios and go based off of that. You should never discount periphery analysis and come up with contingencies.
Lets look at what had to happen for them to fabricate ballots. They would have needed to give China information about the ballots. It's possible that they gave China and nations that printed the ballots samples of older ballots because they didn't think the watermarks were real they probably didn't look for watermarked ballots to send to China.
I think these people operate in corporate board room situations. If they higher ups say it's a dumb idea then they don't go through with it. If the data says it's statistically impossible then it's not looked at. It's very simple and liner thinking. You can't always think simply when running a nation or conducting a military. You can for a business but even then the more creative you are the more it pays off. Some of the greatest battles in history were won because someone decided to exploit an opportunity no one else would. The Siege of Tyre by Alexander the Great is a good example of this. They didn't think he was crazy enough to stick with building a land bridge. When he did they had no contingencies. The Hessians didn't expect the Patriots to cross the Delaware but through faith and skill they did. To quote Sun Tzu;
"To perceive victory when it is known to all is not really skilful... It does not take much strength to lift a hair, it does not take sharp eyes to see the sun and moon, it does not take sharp ears to hear the thunderclap."
Or to put it simply and quote Pantera
"To be, to see cannot be taught."
yeah, and what happened to the fake ballots the chinese were supposedly burning at their closed embassy in texas
I think that nobody (either side) saw this Jovan Pulitzer guy coming. If you had a blank paper and could write down any skill set that you would want in a person coming to help you in an election fraud situation, you couldn't ask for much more than what's in this Jovan package. Brilliant, independently wealthy, passionate for his side and having tons of previous experience in ballot investigations. What kind of luck has fallen upon us? Unbelievable. Feeling good about this state, so far.