So previous, [hopefully] not as corrupt version of the SC made that canon. And now a very corrupt version of many courts at diff levels must assess the results of the AZ audit and apply that ?
The former, according to Q. And looking at the behavior of the court recently, the ship has sailed on ever again being able to rely on them to do the right thing.
I was merely answering your query as to whether the court CAN unring that bell. They can. But their recent behavior suggests they will make slave-owning compulsory before they'll adjudge the election null and void due to fraud.
Regarding Pence, what still sticks with me today is Trump’s comment during his Jan 6th rally, where he said (not verbatim) “it takes more courage to do nothing”
Unfortunately it won't undo the official certification by the Senate. I'm not even sure SCOTUS can un-ring that bell. Pence really did screw us over.
Fraud vitiates [cancels] everything.
--Supreme Court, 1878
In a world where the rule of law is a thing and people follow it, yes.
In this world? not so much...
So previous, [hopefully] not as corrupt version of the SC made that canon. And now a very corrupt version of many courts at diff levels must assess the results of the AZ audit and apply that ?
Survey says not likely. History will be no guide.
So which is it? The Military is the only way or SCOTUS will overturn the election?
The former, according to Q. And looking at the behavior of the court recently, the ship has sailed on ever again being able to rely on them to do the right thing.
I was merely answering your query as to whether the court CAN unring that bell. They can. But their recent behavior suggests they will make slave-owning compulsory before they'll adjudge the election null and void due to fraud.
The military is the backup.
The last bastion of the law.
Will they call Trumps bluff?
Trump doesn't bluff....
Regarding Pence, what still sticks with me today is Trump’s comment during his Jan 6th rally, where he said (not verbatim) “it takes more courage to do nothing”
Same I remember watching that live and I was pretty confused. Still am lol
This could be bad for Pence then....
they apptly didnt want to set a precedent for the incumbent VP picking the next President
Well, if Pence was paid to "do nothing" then it was really something wasn't it? Didnt Pence just get a book deal or something?
Nope, if its fraud, Trump wins. Check the law.
Does it? Can you site the exact law? Also, since when do they obey the law?
if its fraud, new elections must be held, it isnt handed to the opponent
That which has the authority to certify, logically also has the authority to de-certify.
Everything in our legal system has a remedy....