Lol not true, that’s a straight up lie. I’m responding to your other comments (not on this thread I guess). I don’t even know what comment thread I’m responding to because I’m doing this on my phone and can’t see all the comments. I’m just responding to the notification bell.
You obviously haven’t been banned yet for asking a totally normal question. It happens here all the time. The only reason OP’s comment wasn’t deleted by mods is because it would prove OP right.
I mean an actual question. Not some political statement with a '?' at the end. An honest question.
The gotcha questions that are disingenuous don't help anyone. Also their is a sub forum for questions too. Could try over there. Maybe it was not relevant to this subject what you asked.
Ugh you say that, but it’s always happening. Here’s just some random ones off my head:
Why isn’t Hillary in jail and why did the military never take over? Why do you continue to trust Q drops if there have been false predictions?
If other people are being manipulated by MSM misinformation, why do you think you are not being manipulated by Q misinformation?
If vaccines are secretly killing everyone, why wouldn’t the DS use something more hidden like food or over-the-counter medication? It’s far more expensive and difficult to create mass-vaccination sites.
I mean, I could go on and on. And by the way, “do your own research” is not an answer, it’s just a way to avoid the question.
The thing is, the more questions asked, the more likely I’ll get banned. I’d be happy to discuss elsewhere though.
I don’t watch mainstream news. I don’t know anyone under 40yrs old that watches mainstream news. This is why a bunch of tech-illiterate boomers got manipulated by an online message board.
All of your answers would take time to unpack, so I’m just going to focus on one thing for now.
Q asks us to specifically do research like looking up old newspapers and doing our own thinking.
Research does not mean finding information that you agree with and drawing red lines between them. Research means finding contradictory sources (sources you agree with AND sources that oppose your views), and then using additional evidence to deduce which source of information is the most accurate.
This is why I mocked “do your own research,” because it’s not research when you’re simply confirming your own biases. Actually doing research would involve looking at both Q drops and MSM, and then providing additional evidence to both sources and trying to deduce which seems the most correct.
Why do you trust a random internet person (Q) that posted on an anonymous message board?
This may seem like a silly question, but as someone that grew up on the internet, it was always common knowledge that every message board / chat room was full of trolls, liars, bad faith actors, sociopaths, and master manipulators.
Remember the saying, “never trust anything you read on the internet”? It’s because the internet is full of bullshit artists.
Obviously, some things can be drawn to conclusion, like gravity or the weather.
However, when it comes to nuanced situations regarding people and their thoughts, you have to scrutinize your own biases more thoroughly.
For example, from that video, maybe Kanye was giving a Masonic handshake to Jay-Z or maybe he was giving a half-hearted high five because of the reach? I’ve done that plenty of times, and it never meant a Masonic handshake, I just wasn’t paying attention to giving a high-five. You see what I mean?
The world is complex and nuanced. Not everything can be explained by using your own personal belief system. Certain things need to be double-checked and scrutinized more critically.
The original Q posts were debunked by 4chan users, which would mean any projections from a consensus would be based on faulty information.
Just because a large group of people agree on the same biases, it doesn’t mean the original information is not fake. Large groups of people used to think the world was flat. I mean, 4chan was a notorious shitpost site, posters were constantly trying to fuck with groups of IRL people.
Don’t you think it’s strange that most Q followers are from the boomer generation? Why do you think that happened?
Liars gonna lie
Lol not true, that’s a straight up lie. I’m responding to your other comments (not on this thread I guess). I don’t even know what comment thread I’m responding to because I’m doing this on my phone and can’t see all the comments. I’m just responding to the notification bell.
You obviously haven’t been banned yet for asking a totally normal question. It happens here all the time. The only reason OP’s comment wasn’t deleted by mods is because it would prove OP right.
What's your question.
I mean an actual question. Not some political statement with a '?' at the end. An honest question.
The gotcha questions that are disingenuous don't help anyone. Also their is a sub forum for questions too. Could try over there. Maybe it was not relevant to this subject what you asked.
Ugh you say that, but it’s always happening. Here’s just some random ones off my head:
Why isn’t Hillary in jail and why did the military never take over? Why do you continue to trust Q drops if there have been false predictions?
If other people are being manipulated by MSM misinformation, why do you think you are not being manipulated by Q misinformation?
If vaccines are secretly killing everyone, why wouldn’t the DS use something more hidden like food or over-the-counter medication? It’s far more expensive and difficult to create mass-vaccination sites.
I mean, I could go on and on. And by the way, “do your own research” is not an answer, it’s just a way to avoid the question.
The thing is, the more questions asked, the more likely I’ll get banned. I’d be happy to discuss elsewhere though.
I don’t watch mainstream news. I don’t know anyone under 40yrs old that watches mainstream news. This is why a bunch of tech-illiterate boomers got manipulated by an online message board.
All of your answers would take time to unpack, so I’m just going to focus on one thing for now.
Research does not mean finding information that you agree with and drawing red lines between them. Research means finding contradictory sources (sources you agree with AND sources that oppose your views), and then using additional evidence to deduce which source of information is the most accurate.
This is why I mocked “do your own research,” because it’s not research when you’re simply confirming your own biases. Actually doing research would involve looking at both Q drops and MSM, and then providing additional evidence to both sources and trying to deduce which seems the most correct.
OK here’s a basic question:
Why do you trust a random internet person (Q) that posted on an anonymous message board?
This may seem like a silly question, but as someone that grew up on the internet, it was always common knowledge that every message board / chat room was full of trolls, liars, bad faith actors, sociopaths, and master manipulators. Remember the saying, “never trust anything you read on the internet”? It’s because the internet is full of bullshit artists.
No, you’re misunderstanding me.
Obviously, some things can be drawn to conclusion, like gravity or the weather.
However, when it comes to nuanced situations regarding people and their thoughts, you have to scrutinize your own biases more thoroughly.
For example, from that video, maybe Kanye was giving a Masonic handshake to Jay-Z or maybe he was giving a half-hearted high five because of the reach? I’ve done that plenty of times, and it never meant a Masonic handshake, I just wasn’t paying attention to giving a high-five. You see what I mean?
The world is complex and nuanced. Not everything can be explained by using your own personal belief system. Certain things need to be double-checked and scrutinized more critically.
Earlier, you said you trusted the original Q posts because other people did as well. How do you know that those people weren’t being misled?
Start at the source, anything you believed after those original posts is just confirmation bias.
The original Q posts were debunked by 4chan users, which would mean any projections from a consensus would be based on faulty information.
Just because a large group of people agree on the same biases, it doesn’t mean the original information is not fake. Large groups of people used to think the world was flat. I mean, 4chan was a notorious shitpost site, posters were constantly trying to fuck with groups of IRL people.
Don’t you think it’s strange that most Q followers are from the boomer generation? Why do you think that happened?