How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
(media.greatawakening.win)
? B O O M ! ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
not a big fan of the insinuation that rudy planned to have his home raided by xiden gestapo shock troops.
everything isn't "the plan" guys...
Exactly. This is anything but the plan.
They omitted anything Hunter related from the raid. That’s no bueno.
Plot twist: Rudy labeled his computer “HUNTER BIDEN” and Hunters computer “Rudy Giulliani”
My fren! That’s top KEK son
Who gives a fuck about hunter? Of all the reasons the fbi sucks, hunter biden is not exactly the top most priority. Going after hunter wouldn't right the wrongs of the past election.
Not arguing against your point.
But what message/optics are conveyed by taking everything but that?
I very well could be wrong, but to me, it doesn’t look like a positive for our side of the aisle.
Well if we want to play the trust the plan game, the optics would be misdirection. Make it seem like you're taking down rudy, instead of legally collecting evidence into the record. However as much as I trust the plan, who knows if this is part of it. To me it seems like a takedown to offset the az audit. Once again, they can't go after the teflon don, but they go after his associates.
every war has back and forths, gives and takes, each side will score it's victories.
but pretending it was a win for us for rudy to be disrespected and mistreated like this is kinda fucked.
we should be pissed this happened not celebrating