This is a must read, this stuff is crazy and unbelievable:
https://tapnewswire.com/2021/04/stay-away-from-the-vaxxed-it-is-official-from-pfizers-own-documents/
Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:
-
If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.
-
If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry, B: spontaneously abort, C. poison a baby via her breast milk D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.
Be careful with this. I'm not saying it isn't happening but if you want to portray people who don't take the vax as nutters and increase societal division this is exactly how you'd do it. That would cause us to live our lives exactly how the cov-idiots do, essentially flipping the script on us.
Like I said, not saying this isn't happening but let's take our time with it. The cabal rules through fear, don't let them control you with this.
This is going to turn out to be another scam aspect of the covid bullshit, designed to force more separation and terror among the masses.
I see Jim Stone's name associated with this and that makes me doubtful-er. If it's from a pfizer document, why no link or screenshot? Meh.
There is a link to download the original document. I opened it and found a few inconsistencies with how this person "summarizes" the original study. I dont have enough time to dive deep on this (at work) but there "seems" to be something to this - at least on the surface. The document DOES discuss adverse birth defects and issue (adverse affects during breastfeeding etc) that are very interesting and associated with the vax.
Heres an example from the study:
AE = Adverse Effect
SAE = Serious Adverse Effect
VERY interesting language: "May or may not..."
To me it smacks of scaremongering, designed to cause division. I think it's a deliberate misinterpretation.
Anyway, what's an "unplanned direct contact" compared with a planned direct contact?
Article states info was downloaded from the original source. So, where's the link to the original source?
It's linked in the article.
Got it. Thanks!
This is the second time today this storyline was posted. When you read the original document it appears to be what people who volunteered for the study would read and sign. This guidance was for people to report if an issue like this happened so it could be investigated. This is probably typical testing protocol.
The way it's worded looks like bullshit
I'm not buying it.
No vaccine has ever spread to non-willing people in the vicinity of the supposed vaccinated person before. The only organism that infects others in this way is a DISEASE.
Is that what these RNA shots are, a bioterrorist disease spreading program? What are the chances that multiple biopharma companies with all the incentive in the world to keep their trade-secrets and development programs highly restricted have all independently made a 'cure' that's a worse disease than the supposed china virus that spurred its creation?
I dont care what terminology or nomenclature you want to call it, a 'leaky vaccine' or whatever. If it walks like a diseased duck and quacks like a diseased duck, chances is that its a duck. With a disease.
Well its not the vaccine spreading, in as much as it is the weakened disease that gives the vaccine its efficacy being spreadable. All legit vaccines contain live diseases which is why they work, training your immune system to fight it and build up the requisite antibodies to stave off future infections.
But point taken, the more clarity around the issue in this era of massive disinfo, the better.
There was another post today about vaccines that could spread themselves in the same way a natural virus could. Wouldn’t have given this much weight until then but seems readonable