Because we're watching a movie. Trumps line: "You see what I have to deal with" is part of the script. It got you to feel the way you do. So it's working then? Trump and his team are mutha fckin geniuses!
We don't know who is on the Q team. Many of the people sitting in that room also does not know who is on the Q team. The way certain questions are answered could reveal who is on the Q team and who isn't. If the plan was to have the Great Awakening play out and reveal the truth to the people, there would not have been a immediate push to reveal the election fraud up front. I'm sure not everyone sitting in that room could be trusted and answering questions in certain manners could reveal the Q team. How do we know Byrne is not a black hat playing a white hat who was upset because he didn't get the answers he was looking for? I think what I am trying to say is there are many curtains that need to be pulled back before we see who is running the Q operation. Answering certain questions with a affirmative or negative response one could possibly deduce who is running the Q plan and if there were moles in those meetings a certain level of stealth must be maintained to safeguard the operation and protect the players.
We still don't know how much of Byrne's story is even legit. I've seen nobody corroborating it nor denying it either. Maybe Byrne is self-aggrandizing to make himself look more important or maybe he got too close to the truth and had to be misled before he potentially messed something up.
Because we're watching a movie. Trumps line: "You see what I have to deal with" is part of the script. It got you to feel the way you do. So it's working then? Trump and his team are mutha fckin geniuses!
We don't know who is on the Q team. Many of the people sitting in that room also does not know who is on the Q team. The way certain questions are answered could reveal who is on the Q team and who isn't. If the plan was to have the Great Awakening play out and reveal the truth to the people, there would not have been a immediate push to reveal the election fraud up front. I'm sure not everyone sitting in that room could be trusted and answering questions in certain manners could reveal the Q team. How do we know Byrne is not a black hat playing a white hat who was upset because he didn't get the answers he was looking for? I think what I am trying to say is there are many curtains that need to be pulled back before we see who is running the Q operation. Answering certain questions with a affirmative or negative response one could possibly deduce who is running the Q plan and if there were moles in those meetings a certain level of stealth must be maintained to safeguard the operation and protect the players.
Fewer than 10 have the full picture. Of those >10, only 3 are non-military.
Well written.
We still don't know how much of Byrne's story is even legit. I've seen nobody corroborating it nor denying it either. Maybe Byrne is self-aggrandizing to make himself look more important or maybe he got too close to the truth and had to be misled before he potentially messed something up.