Yes, if the science is settled on the recidivism, then the person would still be behind bars or under forced treatment. If a person is let free, he/she is free. Everything else is a slippery slope.
I agree. If the sentences being doled out to these people are not adequate, then reform that for tougher sentencing. Don't give them Mickey Mouse sentences, then persecute them for the rest of their lives.
There are also false convictions; if you've spent time around the punishment system called the justice system it becomes clear. Also there are a few Romeo and Juliet cases (one Alaska case I read about treats ago involved 2 16-year olds who married, the poor guy was ineligible for tons of jobs) that shouldn't qualify. But change the law to punish the real ones according to law, not this scarlet letter stuff. I mean if the law says they live on an island or stay in prison longer, then everybody convicted after that time does it.
Even for a crime with serial behavior? High percentage of repeat offenders.
Yes, if the science is settled on the recidivism, then the person would still be behind bars or under forced treatment. If a person is let free, he/she is free. Everything else is a slippery slope.
I agree. If the sentences being doled out to these people are not adequate, then reform that for tougher sentencing. Don't give them Mickey Mouse sentences, then persecute them for the rest of their lives.
Science settled??? Muhahahahahahajaha science isn't sttlednon shit. Bullshit religion.
There are also false convictions; if you've spent time around the punishment system called the justice system it becomes clear. Also there are a few Romeo and Juliet cases (one Alaska case I read about treats ago involved 2 16-year olds who married, the poor guy was ineligible for tons of jobs) that shouldn't qualify. But change the law to punish the real ones according to law, not this scarlet letter stuff. I mean if the law says they live on an island or stay in prison longer, then everybody convicted after that time does it.