I'm beginning to get the feeling that a lot of this "sci-fi" stuff is put out in movies to convince us that these technologies are fictitious regardless of whether they are or aren't. It's a lot easier to create a stigma about something than it is to completely hide it.

Perfect example I used the other day. The James Bond movie "Quantum of Solace," the main villain buys up land rights near the lowest point of major aquafiers and proceeds to bore tunnels redirecting that water to underground storage with the intent of creating a water shortage and allow the bad guy to be the sole provider of water in that area. Side note, what did CA just do to Nestle the other day?

Take this to a sample conversation with an NPC or even a normie: Me: What's Bill Gates been up to recently? Buying land near or over major aquafiers? Why is he doing that? Stealing water maybe, controlling farmland, etc?

NPC/Normie: You mean like that James Bond movie?! That's dumb, Billy-boy wouldn't do that he cares about people!

That theory is directly discredited before you even get through the first layer of discussion. Take that as one example, who's to say that isn't happening with this stuff?

Oh, and one other diversionary tactic, the creation of strawman conspiracies and good ole' guilt by association. Like with the whole flat Earth thing, they've been trying to tie that to the Q movement (and any other movements they don't really like) so they can sink the whole thing. The Earth isn't flat, perfectly round, no, but certainly not flat.

Smoke and mirrors along with out right inversion of the truth. Those beds likely do exist in some form or another the same way that DUMBS likely exist in some extent or another. Just hope we get to know the extent of all that we think we know someday...sooner rather than later.