They've recently run a bunch of articles that supposedly document the military tribunal for, and subsequent of, HRC. Even if the events were true, and they clearly haven't been reported anywhere else yet, the reporting style looks more like a student of creative writing than a student of journalism. So whenever somebody lists a link to their articles, many people chime in to say its disreputable. That's why.
why ?
If you meant why I said Podesta, look at post 34. https://operationq.pub/?q=11.4
They've recently run a bunch of articles that supposedly document the military tribunal for, and subsequent of, HRC. Even if the events were true, and they clearly haven't been reported anywhere else yet, the reporting style looks more like a student of creative writing than a student of journalism. So whenever somebody lists a link to their articles, many people chime in to say its disreputable. That's why.
too dry, needs more sauce
That site has zero credibility.
Zero.
Thanks,fren,it looks very suspect, the journos must have very vivid imaginations. Some of the stuff is very unusual to say the least.