Disagree, he has appointed a record number of circuit judges and supremes as well. By virtue of human nature, there is going to be some fails in a large enough sample size, regardless of the will and astuteness of the person making the appointments.
Once in place, even if they were a perfect candidate for the job.. the mechanisms for bribing, blackmailing, and compromising judges so that they can be controlled by crime interests on the other hand are probably fine-tuned processes that have existed for decades. In a dystopian and idealised world, every justice would be stored in a steel vault with no outside contact except for the moments when they are needed for trials, so no malign influence can infect them while they arent under scrutiny. Not ever achievable.
So like all systems that purport to have checks and balances, defective pieces must be detected and removed in the course of routine operation. It happens in your body, it happens in companies and social circles, and it has to happen in a judiciary as well.
There was a story maybe from a couple years ago that one of the fed agencies was caught wiretapping or spying on a judge, it might have been a federal circuit court. And it was a significant enough 'outrage' that all the usual hysterics were deployed to describe the situation.
Why wouldn't you surveil judges though to make sure that they were not in contact with criminals? I got a whole panic vibe from the reaction, like the judge was genuinely on the take and was worried that law enforcement had found out. Probably not an uncommon thing.
She and Kavanaugh were Bush vs Gore judges. He picked her on purpose. Every single ass hat Trump picked has been on purpose. Fauci? On purpose to expose his racket. You don't have to theorize. Q has already told us.
Like that time they removed John Robert...er, never mind. In our entire history as a country, only 8 federal judges have ever been removed through peach-mint - the last being 11 years ago and only ONE Supreme has ever been impeached but he was not removed by a Senate trial and that was in 1804. One of the impeached judges, Alcee Hastings, was elected to congress just four years after being impeached (Democrat, go figure). My point being, the judicial system does not have a stellar record of removing it's "defective pieces"
With you on that one. The lifetime appointment thing alone is a huge problem - compromise a new judge once, and that's what, 30+ years of owning them and being able to call in a vote on any case. Huge incentives for crime interests to subvert the judiciary.
Disagree, he has appointed a record number of circuit judges and supremes as well. By virtue of human nature, there is going to be some fails in a large enough sample size, regardless of the will and astuteness of the person making the appointments.
Once in place, even if they were a perfect candidate for the job.. the mechanisms for bribing, blackmailing, and compromising judges so that they can be controlled by crime interests on the other hand are probably fine-tuned processes that have existed for decades. In a dystopian and idealised world, every justice would be stored in a steel vault with no outside contact except for the moments when they are needed for trials, so no malign influence can infect them while they arent under scrutiny. Not ever achievable.
So like all systems that purport to have checks and balances, defective pieces must be detected and removed in the course of routine operation. It happens in your body, it happens in companies and social circles, and it has to happen in a judiciary as well.
There was a story maybe from a couple years ago that one of the fed agencies was caught wiretapping or spying on a judge, it might have been a federal circuit court. And it was a significant enough 'outrage' that all the usual hysterics were deployed to describe the situation.
Why wouldn't you surveil judges though to make sure that they were not in contact with criminals? I got a whole panic vibe from the reaction, like the judge was genuinely on the take and was worried that law enforcement had found out. Probably not an uncommon thing.
But then they’d get their payoff reward a week after they leave. It’s all shady as cluck and we know it.
It would get them to retire earlier, though...
She and Kavanaugh were Bush vs Gore judges. He picked her on purpose. Every single ass hat Trump picked has been on purpose. Fauci? On purpose to expose his racket. You don't have to theorize. Q has already told us.
Yes, it’s impossible that Trump could ever make a mistake, since he is literally preserved from the possibilility of error by the Holy Spirit.
?
Like that time they removed John Robert...er, never mind. In our entire history as a country, only 8 federal judges have ever been removed through peach-mint - the last being 11 years ago and only ONE Supreme has ever been impeached but he was not removed by a Senate trial and that was in 1804. One of the impeached judges, Alcee Hastings, was elected to congress just four years after being impeached (Democrat, go figure). My point being, the judicial system does not have a stellar record of removing it's "defective pieces"
With you on that one. The lifetime appointment thing alone is a huge problem - compromise a new judge once, and that's what, 30+ years of owning them and being able to call in a vote on any case. Huge incentives for crime interests to subvert the judiciary.