I Live in Ac heard radio talk show this am interviewing Ken Bennett (not sure if name is exact) who is the Az senate liason for the Maricopa County election audit. But he said the UV lights were being utilized to: 1. check for folds on mail in ballots and 2. to look for watermarks which should not be there as the paper manufacturer contracted for the official ballots had no water marks. Take it for what you will
Eh? I'm talking about the paper they're printed on. If the people doing the counting don't look for or intentionally ignore discrepancies in the paper they can very well count them regardless of where they came from. They thought nobody was going to go back and look, that's why they're panicking.
The ballot straight up says it's from Texas on it.
yup...and 48 more too
I Live in Ac heard radio talk show this am interviewing Ken Bennett (not sure if name is exact) who is the Az senate liason for the Maricopa County election audit. But he said the UV lights were being utilized to: 1. check for folds on mail in ballots and 2. to look for watermarks which should not be there as the paper manufacturer contracted for the official ballots had no water marks. Take it for what you will
If proper ballots don't have watermarks then it stands for to reason fake ballots should not have them either.
Ballot security measures vary by state/county.
Matches the truck-driver story from (NY to PA?)
But actually that's great - since it makes it impossible to use ballots from other states.
Eh? I'm talking about the paper they're printed on. If the people doing the counting don't look for or intentionally ignore discrepancies in the paper they can very well count them regardless of where they came from. They thought nobody was going to go back and look, that's why they're panicking.
Sure fren, I wanted to say the same thing; maybe more like "impossible to cheat, when someone audits..."
That’s a Texas ballot.
oopsie
Wow! Do you have a link to this?