There have been so many things like this over the last year and a half of lockdowns. They force a narrative, then suggest and implement "safety" measure, and then ignore when said narrative gets scientifically disproven. Then continue with "safety" measure. CoVid game plan.
Weaponized “science” which is inherently not science because they’re picking and choosing which data points to pay attention to and use them accordingly
I know that some types of disease can be spread asymptomatically (Typhoid Mary comes to mind). What is it about Covid that we know for sure asymptomatic spread can't happen? I'm seeing differing opinions online related to this...although I guess that's pretty much just like everything else related to Covid over the past year. I don't trust the CDC 100% like the sheep do, but I'm hesitant to distrust everything they say either.
There are a lot of research papers, unfortunately the real problem is these studies are not disseminated / meta-studied nearly well enough, let alone use the current covid infrastructure to collect more reliable data on asymptotic transfer.
they revised the asymptotic transfer from 80% as initially reported to under 20%
asymptotic people are 3-25 times less likely to pass infection than symptomatic people
that people with SARS-CoV-2 can become infectious one to two days before the onset of symptoms and continue to be infectious up to seven days thereafter; viable virus is relatively short lived.
49% of people who are defined as asymptotic carriers actually went on to develop symptoms
The real question is, what is the proof that there was asymptotic transfer in the first place. As far as I remember it was just Chinese reporting that WHO decided to accept as factual and used for all their recommendations.
Same. Would love to cite this when I truthbomb people but I’m not sure they’ve even studied it yet. Asymptomatic spread is the only argument these maskholes and psychological child abusers can use. Would love to see the sauce.
Asymptotic spread was the BIG LIE in covid-19, and is the reason for everything we see. But no one talks about it anymore, comfortably forgotten.
There have been so many things like this over the last year and a half of lockdowns. They force a narrative, then suggest and implement "safety" measure, and then ignore when said narrative gets scientifically disproven. Then continue with "safety" measure. CoVid game plan.
Weaponized “science” which is inherently not science because they’re picking and choosing which data points to pay attention to and use them accordingly
I know that some types of disease can be spread asymptomatically (Typhoid Mary comes to mind). What is it about Covid that we know for sure asymptomatic spread can't happen? I'm seeing differing opinions online related to this...although I guess that's pretty much just like everything else related to Covid over the past year. I don't trust the CDC 100% like the sheep do, but I'm hesitant to distrust everything they say either.
Lol I don’t trust a word the cdc says
It’s not even contagious.
See my previous reply
I’ve been looking for some good sources for the ‘asymptomatic is a lie’ got any handy?
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i4DHb0KP/reminder-asymptomatic-transmissi/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i4DM98N8/cdc-suddenly-changes-their-tune-/c/
There are a lot of research papers, unfortunately the real problem is these studies are not disseminated / meta-studied nearly well enough, let alone use the current covid infrastructure to collect more reliable data on asymptotic transfer.
Take a look at the abstract of this paper: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4851
It has references to studies that show:
they revised the asymptotic transfer from 80% as initially reported to under 20%
asymptotic people are 3-25 times less likely to pass infection than symptomatic people
that people with SARS-CoV-2 can become infectious one to two days before the onset of symptoms and continue to be infectious up to seven days thereafter; viable virus is relatively short lived.
49% of people who are defined as asymptotic carriers actually went on to develop symptoms
The real question is, what is the proof that there was asymptotic transfer in the first place. As far as I remember it was just Chinese reporting that WHO decided to accept as factual and used for all their recommendations.
Same. Would love to cite this when I truthbomb people but I’m not sure they’ve even studied it yet. Asymptomatic spread is the only argument these maskholes and psychological child abusers can use. Would love to see the sauce.