Reposted from my other post about this exact same video:
Why is it that every time Trump or Flynn are asked about the fake term "QAnon" they always tend to avoid explicitly denying its validity or disassociating with it?
Assuming Q is fake, would it not be in their best interest to directly state that, as Q is claiming to be within their administration? Would Trump not want to denounce someone who many believe is impersonating him (Q+)? Just like Q was quick to denounce "R".
I think we all know the answer to this question...
Yes WE do...that is why I find it so amazing that THEY dont see that ....even my conservative IRL and Online Friends shrug it off when I bring that same argument up with them...
I dont see why it is so hart to fathom that if there is a worldwide evil Cabal , which they most all agree with...then why cant you conceive there are people trying to bring them down...
I mean I understand the negativity when they see what is going on in the country but the folks wont even entertain researching .
This is why we can't falter to our emotions when it's so obvious that Q is legit. Right now things seem really tough, but one day we will all look back and be proud of how firm we were in our beliefs.
Asking Trump, Flynn or anybody like them about „Qanon“ is a gotcha-question, and answering it will do no good, so a non-answer and not aknowleding the question in any way is the only way not getting entrapped in their gotcha-game.
Assuming Q is not legit, all Trump or Flynn would have to do is respond: "Q is not a part of the Trump administration, and Trump is not Q+, disregard them immediately." But they never say that, instead asking more questions to get us thinking and researching.
Again assuming Q is not legit, Q could have at any moment in the past completely disregarded the entire movement, thus disregarding any legitimacy of the research and give Trump and Flynn bad optics on both sides for being so aloof.
Reposted from my other post about this exact same video:
Why is it that every time Trump or Flynn are asked about the fake term "QAnon" they always tend to avoid explicitly denying its validity or disassociating with it?
Assuming Q is fake, would it not be in their best interest to directly state that, as Q is claiming to be within their administration? Would Trump not want to denounce someone who many believe is impersonating him (Q+)? Just like Q was quick to denounce "R".
I think we all know the answer to this question...
Yes WE do...that is why I find it so amazing that THEY dont see that ....even my conservative IRL and Online Friends shrug it off when I bring that same argument up with them...
I dont see why it is so hart to fathom that if there is a worldwide evil Cabal , which they most all agree with...then why cant you conceive there are people trying to bring them down...
I mean I understand the negativity when they see what is going on in the country but the folks wont even entertain researching .
This is why we can't falter to our emotions when it's so obvious that Q is legit. Right now things seem really tough, but one day we will all look back and be proud of how firm we were in our beliefs.
Activity has been low here the past few weeks, all of a sudden new accounts are popping up again to spout doomer nonsense.
Most of the faltering emotions over the past week have been from shills trying to demoralize us.
A futile effort, of course.
Asking Trump, Flynn or anybody like them about „Qanon“ is a gotcha-question, and answering it will do no good, so a non-answer and not aknowleding the question in any way is the only way not getting entrapped in their gotcha-game.
Assuming Q is not legit, all Trump or Flynn would have to do is respond: "Q is not a part of the Trump administration, and Trump is not Q+, disregard them immediately." But they never say that, instead asking more questions to get us thinking and researching.
Again assuming Q is not legit, Q could have at any moment in the past completely disregarded the entire movement, thus disregarding any legitimacy of the research and give Trump and Flynn bad optics on both sides for being so aloof.
Right. Bringing back up the whole 4Chan and 8chan propaganda would do no good.