... if the Covid Vaccination is determined to have been engineered to spread to the unvaccinated, those who chose not to vaccinate, are those now vaccinated, without their consent, eligible to sue the bejesus out of big pharma from here to kingdom come? Thanks in advance for considering the question, our surviving family members may need to know.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Good question.
I have a strong suspicion that after the Genuine President is installed,
it will co-incide with the total exposure of this massive crime . the methods and the players.
Any and all immunises from liability will be removed and people will be free to pursue class-action or personal actions against the likes of Gates and fauci et al.
And the irony will be that conservatives will teach the dim-witted socialists how to properly apply "wealth redistribution" for "social justice." And of course, the socialist useful idiots will fight against it, then.
I wonder if it can spread via sexual contact. Should I start avoiding all vaccinated like they have leprosy?
are people getting vaccinated forcefully?
That's not what the post is about. It's about vaccinated people shedding to others who didn't get it.
Not yet, but certain vaccines have been engineered to automatically spread from those vaccinated to those unvaccinated.
Dr Madjef is talking to Dr Kaufman on this vid about nanobots her teacher showed pupils. it was work she was doing for the military...this was before cell phones..but it may be how shedding is accomplished..
https://mypatriotsnetwork.com/patriot/dr-carrie-madej-credible-or-debunked-you-may-be-shocked-when-you-see-this/
Sauce for Pfizer admitting this is one of those...
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/05/04/pfizer-confirms-covid-vaccine-shedding-leading-to-menstrual-cycle-disruption-is-possible/
any sauce for that?
Yes through threat of losing their jobs. That's huge
If forced to receive for a job, it should be a OSHA work related injury for forcing people.
If the vaccines were designed to harm people... If they had malicious intent, and this can be proven, I don't think any waiver would shield them.
if (big IF) it can be proven yes. i believe that even those being "vaccinatedc can sue because it's technically not a vaccine. my hope is that Q planned for this and the big pharmas will be taken down
How is this unvaxxed person going to prove they got it from the vax person.
Did this person (the unvaxxed) ever mingle around another person (unvaxxed or not) for 15 minutes or longer?
This is during a "pandemic" of a communicable disease.
You and your theory will hold no where. Sorry.
You will not find even a lawyer to take this case.
If the person did not get the vaccination, but becomes vaccinated. Please tell me where it came from? My guess is engineered Big Pharma shedding program. Perhaps the unvaccinated should be making declarations now regarding their unvaccinated state.
You think killing by infectious disease is some brave new legal paradigm with no history, case law or precedent? Guess again.
If disease tracking apps and proximity warnings are workable for the china virus (and every government in the world insists this is so!), then guess what, as a concept it will also work with tracking people infected with this dangerous weaponized RNA cocktail that people are calling a vaccine out of ignorance and malice.
The RNA vaccine is the communicable disease. How on Gods earth did we go from insisting safety is so paramount that mask mandates, police checkpoints, and a terrifying surveillance culture is necessary.. but at the same time, shooting up people with a random untested chemical cocktail (that spreads like an disease) is something we can abandon every safety standard on?
No. If you are all about the safety, the only place the RNA vaccine belongs is in the trash, with enough samples set aside for labs and courts to prosecute moderna, pfizer, and any other reckless RNA bioterrorists.
absolutely...by definition all 'vaccines' are manmade in a laboratory with a patent and thus are illegal bioweapons... surely they can be prosecuted for this alone?
My view on vaccines is concisely summarized by the lobbying of big pharma to demand liability exemptions for their product lines.
If you have to whine how your entire industry is doomed because your products are too risky and dangerous for use.. then your industry ought not exist.
Congress should have had some stones and told them to smarten the fuck up and repair their defective and dangerous products.. not given them license to kill and maim. The idea they have been given exemption from harm uniquely from all other groups is an abomination.
Well said. The automobile manufacturers should apply for legal immunity too, and use the same arguments that pharma does. When their legal immunity is denied, turn around and use the legal ruling as a precedent against the pharma corps. and strip the bastards of their illegal immunity as well.