Looking at the document this is a protocol. This is not evidence of an occurrence of "vaccine shedding".
Consider these facts:
The foundation of the argument that the vaccine makers are proving "shedding" is based entirely on a published experimental protocol.
There is no data whatsoever that the article is basing its argument on. They are basing their argument on a protocol, not any experimental result itself.
OTHER VACCINE protocols include such off target transmission because OTHER VACCINES are made of real viruses that can sometimes be transmissible.
It is easy to make a connection with (3) as to why it would be included in this protocol because it is standard vaccine protocol to include it. It is also good practice because biology is complicated. Things you might not think of can happen, so keeping an eye out for things that have happened in OTHER vaccine experiments is smart protocol, even if, in this case, its unlikely because its a completely different category of technology.
All of the anecdotal evidence I have seen for off target effects of the vaccine have been related to the menstrual cycle. Evidence suggests these vaccines seem to have direct effects on the blood. The vaccine having primary target menstrual disruption, or excessive menstrual bleeding would not surprise me, and indeed there is good statistical data to support that.
Starting from that primary target effect, it would not surprise me that it would have off target effects as well. Why? Because menstrual sympathy is an incredibly common and well-known effect that has been going on for all human history. Such sympathy has been attributed to a pheromone response.
Pheromones can be very potent biological effectors. To assume it is NOT pheromones, but is instead "shedding" of some unknown piece of the vaccine is foolish. That doesn't mean we should dismiss the possibility, but to ignore the most likely case in favor of the less likely is completely irresponsible and generally done from fear, not reason, and definitely not science.
I do not see anything sinister here specifically. There most certainly is not evidence that it is happening as there is no data whatsoever.
If there is evidence that these things DID occur with the coronavirus vaccine in the experimental RESULTS then that would be evidence of it occurring. This, is not that.
"If there is evidence that these things DID occur with the coronavirus vaccine in the experimental RESULTS ..." --- aren't we the experiment? Regardless, do appreciate your comment, thoughtful and potentially right. Its just that we will not know until this experiment using humans reaches its conclusion.
we will not know until this experiment using humans reaches its conclusion.
If we even know it then. Depends on who writes the history books (who the victors are).
In this case I am pointing out that this report is not based on evidence. From a place where I don't need to be afraid, but care only about what the truth is, this story that is currently circulating looks a whole lot like fear mongering and disinformation.
If we win, I think the result will be a massive improvement in health care due to the exposure of so many things, including the attempts at obfuscation. Because we are getting both information on how bad current systems are, and how corrupt all our "health" organizations are, it makes me think this was always the plan. Just one more avenue of the Patriots to help the world wake up.
You are not afraid: We are the experiment, and shedding is a distinct possibility unless proven otherwise. We should also mention that Bill Gates is the ramrod of this operation, a known eugenicist. I would be afraid, but that is just me.
shedding is a distinct possibility unless proven otherwise
This is not true at all. It is far from "distinct" and indeed, I have seen no reasonable biological basis for it. The spike protein is a transmembrane protein. It can't just "shed". It must remain within a membrane in order to hold its structure. This means it can't just be the protein shedding, but must somehow be entire pieces of a cell that are somehow escaping the body, somehow getting to other people, and somehow getting into other peoples bodies, and somehow finding their ways to the cells where the spike protein can do anything at all. And even if they get there, the most likely scenario is that these magical blebs will be consumed and broken down into the constituent amino acids and fatty acids and carbohydrates that make them up.
That's a whole lot of things that these hypothetical magical blebs have no built in function to do (unlike an actual virus).
You are not afraid:
I am not afraid of the things that others are afraid of, because looking at the evidence without a need to fear, I find most fears have no evidential basis, at least in scope.
I am not a random internet person (or at least I am not JUST a random internet person). I am also a biology researcher. I understand what I am looking at. I try to give the truth of the scope of things, in the hopes it will alleviate fears that are unjustified (again, in scope).
We should also mention that Bill Gates is the ramrod of this operation, a known eugenicist.
Bill Gates' overall plans for world domination and depopulation do not change the evidence of THESE vaccines and THIS virus.
He is also not the only force in play...
I would be afraid, but that is just me.
I cannot change your emotional state. I can only try to present an analysis of the evidence, and discourage, through an application of topical knowledge, the spreading of disinformation and the associated unfounded fears.
Why on earth would someone think that because I am discerning with information that I am pro vaccine? That's just utterly ridiculous. What did I say that was in ANY WAY pro vaccine?
I spend a great deal of time writing about why people should not get the vaccine. The number of GENUINE reasons to not get it is overwhelming. But this reason has no basis in evidence. Period.
I am doing nothing more than explaining HOW it has no evidential basis. You choosing to ignore that because you want to fear more than you want to consider contrary evidence is you drinking the kool-aid (believing disinformation).
This is great information, Slyver. I don't have your expertise, but my gut says that the shredding hypothesis is weak, and find the idea that the DS could engineer a vaccine for their engineered virus that would not only harm the receiver, but then go on to harm those around him all a bit preposterous,
Looking at the document this is a protocol. This is not evidence of an occurrence of "vaccine shedding".
Consider these facts:
All of the anecdotal evidence I have seen for off target effects of the vaccine have been related to the menstrual cycle. Evidence suggests these vaccines seem to have direct effects on the blood. The vaccine having primary target menstrual disruption, or excessive menstrual bleeding would not surprise me, and indeed there is good statistical data to support that.
Starting from that primary target effect, it would not surprise me that it would have off target effects as well. Why? Because menstrual sympathy is an incredibly common and well-known effect that has been going on for all human history. Such sympathy has been attributed to a pheromone response.
Pheromones can be very potent biological effectors. To assume it is NOT pheromones, but is instead "shedding" of some unknown piece of the vaccine is foolish. That doesn't mean we should dismiss the possibility, but to ignore the most likely case in favor of the less likely is completely irresponsible and generally done from fear, not reason, and definitely not science.
I do not see anything sinister here specifically. There most certainly is not evidence that it is happening as there is no data whatsoever.
If there is evidence that these things DID occur with the coronavirus vaccine in the experimental RESULTS then that would be evidence of it occurring. This, is not that.
"If there is evidence that these things DID occur with the coronavirus vaccine in the experimental RESULTS ..." --- aren't we the experiment? Regardless, do appreciate your comment, thoughtful and potentially right. Its just that we will not know until this experiment using humans reaches its conclusion.
If we even know it then. Depends on who writes the history books (who the victors are).
In this case I am pointing out that this report is not based on evidence. From a place where I don't need to be afraid, but care only about what the truth is, this story that is currently circulating looks a whole lot like fear mongering and disinformation.
This pandemic has potentially the most valuable data in the most obfuscated form of any world wide human event, ever.
For sure.
If we win, I think the result will be a massive improvement in health care due to the exposure of so many things, including the attempts at obfuscation. Because we are getting both information on how bad current systems are, and how corrupt all our "health" organizations are, it makes me think this was always the plan. Just one more avenue of the Patriots to help the world wake up.
No system or group is an island, it all is connected, not a hierarchy as people tend to believe. That makes change tough.
You are not afraid: We are the experiment, and shedding is a distinct possibility unless proven otherwise. We should also mention that Bill Gates is the ramrod of this operation, a known eugenicist. I would be afraid, but that is just me.
This is not true at all. It is far from "distinct" and indeed, I have seen no reasonable biological basis for it. The spike protein is a transmembrane protein. It can't just "shed". It must remain within a membrane in order to hold its structure. This means it can't just be the protein shedding, but must somehow be entire pieces of a cell that are somehow escaping the body, somehow getting to other people, and somehow getting into other peoples bodies, and somehow finding their ways to the cells where the spike protein can do anything at all. And even if they get there, the most likely scenario is that these magical blebs will be consumed and broken down into the constituent amino acids and fatty acids and carbohydrates that make them up.
That's a whole lot of things that these hypothetical magical blebs have no built in function to do (unlike an actual virus).
I am not afraid of the things that others are afraid of, because looking at the evidence without a need to fear, I find most fears have no evidential basis, at least in scope.
I am not a random internet person (or at least I am not JUST a random internet person). I am also a biology researcher. I understand what I am looking at. I try to give the truth of the scope of things, in the hopes it will alleviate fears that are unjustified (again, in scope).
Bill Gates' overall plans for world domination and depopulation do not change the evidence of THESE vaccines and THIS virus.
He is also not the only force in play...
I cannot change your emotional state. I can only try to present an analysis of the evidence, and discourage, through an application of topical knowledge, the spreading of disinformation and the associated unfounded fears.
You've taken the shots, drank the Cool Aide, good luck to you. Go for the proposed third. Let me know how it turns out.
Why on earth would someone think that because I am discerning with information that I am pro vaccine? That's just utterly ridiculous. What did I say that was in ANY WAY pro vaccine?
I spend a great deal of time writing about why people should not get the vaccine. The number of GENUINE reasons to not get it is overwhelming. But this reason has no basis in evidence. Period.
I am doing nothing more than explaining HOW it has no evidential basis. You choosing to ignore that because you want to fear more than you want to consider contrary evidence is you drinking the kool-aid (believing disinformation).
I get it slyver, very sly and twisted.
This is great information, Slyver. I don't have your expertise, but my gut says that the shredding hypothesis is weak, and find the idea that the DS could engineer a vaccine for their engineered virus that would not only harm the receiver, but then go on to harm those around him all a bit preposterous,
Bruh.... this is terrifying