shedding is a distinct possibility unless proven otherwise
This is not true at all. It is far from "distinct" and indeed, I have seen no reasonable biological basis for it. The spike protein is a transmembrane protein. It can't just "shed". It must remain within a membrane in order to hold its structure. This means it can't just be the protein shedding, but must somehow be entire pieces of a cell that are somehow escaping the body, somehow getting to other people, and somehow getting into other peoples bodies, and somehow finding their ways to the cells where the spike protein can do anything at all. And even if they get there, the most likely scenario is that these magical blebs will be consumed and broken down into the constituent amino acids and fatty acids and carbohydrates that make them up.
That's a whole lot of things that these hypothetical magical blebs have no built in function to do (unlike an actual virus).
You are not afraid:
I am not afraid of the things that others are afraid of, because looking at the evidence without a need to fear, I find most fears have no evidential basis, at least in scope.
I am not a random internet person (or at least I am not JUST a random internet person). I am also a biology researcher. I understand what I am looking at. I try to give the truth of the scope of things, in the hopes it will alleviate fears that are unjustified (again, in scope).
We should also mention that Bill Gates is the ramrod of this operation, a known eugenicist.
Bill Gates' overall plans for world domination and depopulation do not change the evidence of THESE vaccines and THIS virus.
He is also not the only force in play...
I would be afraid, but that is just me.
I cannot change your emotional state. I can only try to present an analysis of the evidence, and discourage, through an application of topical knowledge, the spreading of disinformation and the associated unfounded fears.
Why on earth would someone think that because I am discerning with information that I am pro vaccine? That's just utterly ridiculous. What did I say that was in ANY WAY pro vaccine?
I spend a great deal of time writing about why people should not get the vaccine. The number of GENUINE reasons to not get it is overwhelming. But this reason has no basis in evidence. Period.
I am doing nothing more than explaining HOW it has no evidential basis. You choosing to ignore that because you want to fear more than you want to consider contrary evidence is you drinking the kool-aid (believing disinformation).
This is great information, Slyver. I don't have your expertise, but my gut says that the shredding hypothesis is weak, and find the idea that the DS could engineer a vaccine for their engineered virus that would not only harm the receiver, but then go on to harm those around him all a bit preposterous,
This is not true at all. It is far from "distinct" and indeed, I have seen no reasonable biological basis for it. The spike protein is a transmembrane protein. It can't just "shed". It must remain within a membrane in order to hold its structure. This means it can't just be the protein shedding, but must somehow be entire pieces of a cell that are somehow escaping the body, somehow getting to other people, and somehow getting into other peoples bodies, and somehow finding their ways to the cells where the spike protein can do anything at all. And even if they get there, the most likely scenario is that these magical blebs will be consumed and broken down into the constituent amino acids and fatty acids and carbohydrates that make them up.
That's a whole lot of things that these hypothetical magical blebs have no built in function to do (unlike an actual virus).
I am not afraid of the things that others are afraid of, because looking at the evidence without a need to fear, I find most fears have no evidential basis, at least in scope.
I am not a random internet person (or at least I am not JUST a random internet person). I am also a biology researcher. I understand what I am looking at. I try to give the truth of the scope of things, in the hopes it will alleviate fears that are unjustified (again, in scope).
Bill Gates' overall plans for world domination and depopulation do not change the evidence of THESE vaccines and THIS virus.
He is also not the only force in play...
I cannot change your emotional state. I can only try to present an analysis of the evidence, and discourage, through an application of topical knowledge, the spreading of disinformation and the associated unfounded fears.
You've taken the shots, drank the Cool Aide, good luck to you. Go for the proposed third. Let me know how it turns out.
Why on earth would someone think that because I am discerning with information that I am pro vaccine? That's just utterly ridiculous. What did I say that was in ANY WAY pro vaccine?
I spend a great deal of time writing about why people should not get the vaccine. The number of GENUINE reasons to not get it is overwhelming. But this reason has no basis in evidence. Period.
I am doing nothing more than explaining HOW it has no evidential basis. You choosing to ignore that because you want to fear more than you want to consider contrary evidence is you drinking the kool-aid (believing disinformation).
I get it slyver, very sly and twisted.
This is great information, Slyver. I don't have your expertise, but my gut says that the shredding hypothesis is weak, and find the idea that the DS could engineer a vaccine for their engineered virus that would not only harm the receiver, but then go on to harm those around him all a bit preposterous,