Family members were asking if I was getting the vaccine, I replied, 'zero chance'. They proudly announced they were getting their 2nd jab and I should get mine. They actually said 'Come on, just go get it.' 'why not' 'what's wrong with you?' and on and on.
Well 2 years ago one of them had a slightly elevated white blood cell count. Drs just said nothing to worry about, we will keep an eye on it. He regularly had blood work drawn, the count remained the same, slightly elevated.
Well end of March he and his wife proudly received their first Pfizer vac. Around April 6-8 they both went to get the 2nd one.
On April 27th, he felt really sick, fever, all over just sick, some pain in midsection, shortness of breath, weak, and tired. He thought he would get better but by April 30th he was so sick he went to ER. He was admitted and received word he has full blown AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia). The doctors said its not from the vaccine.
While they say its not from the vaccine, it most definitely IS a contributor to his condition. His AML might have laid in the weeds for many more years, but you cannot convince me the vaccine did not do this.
So please, if you have any underlying health issues, do not take a chance and think the vaccine is ok. IT IS NOT!!!
Don't the spike proteins essentially have HIV-type immunosuppressant attributes?
There is evidence to support an immunosuppressant function in the SARS-cov-2 spike protein, though it would be unlikely to have the same effect from the mRNA vaccine.
According to this paper, the spike protein may cause a virus/T-cell fusion through some other receptor than ACE-2. This would release the contents of the virus (the entire viral RNA sequence, not just the spike protein part) into the cytosol of a T-cell. This apparently shuts down the T-cell by some mechanism and induces apoptosis (cell death).
The mRNA vaccine on the other hand, causes the bodies own cells to express the spike protein. This may cause a killer T-cell to fuse with another cell, but I think such an event would be rare if at all. There are many safeguards on both cells to prevent that from happening, unlike with the much smaller and less complex virus.
As for the HIV connection, this paper suggests there may be one. Indeed, if this is a designed virus I think it is likely that the spike protein was modified for exactly this reason.
Both of these papers were forced to be removed (archived versions in links above). No further study has happened on either of these topics. Perhaps a little too over the target...
Thanks, Fren. I still believe the HIV connection discovered by those Indian researchers , which was lambasted in February by the medical and scientific establishment, was more legitimate than indicated. Furthermore, I believe that is why we were seeing HIV "false positives" in some of the testing scenarios.
Disclaimer: I am not a scientist, pathologist, virologist or expert. I am a curious Fren who wants to see the truth uncovered. There is so much obfuscation and gaslighting in response to whenever we see someone looking into what's really going on.
The probability that it was both designed, and modeled after HIV is very, very much more likely than not. The HIV-like modifications were found in the 3D structure, not in the sequence. I can't really express how unlikely that is to have occurred by accident. However, its not impossible either. There is evidence of such convergent evolution all through the phylogenetic tree.
I haven't looked at the details of this, but according to this article the HIV false positives were specific to one vaccine because of an HIV protein that was added to stabilize the mixture. If true, these would be unrelated to the potential HIV modifications in the spike protein.
From the article:
Since I haven't seen any other instances of such HIV false positives, I am inclined to believe this explanation.
Consider Fauxi’s ties to Wuhan AND his history with HIV. ?
Excellent response, thank you for your productive feedback, Fren! What is your background, if you don't mind me asking? I'm a "normie" when it comes to all this stuff and I'd rather be proven wrong, but I also want to have objective "proof" instead of what we get from the usual suspects in the scientific community.
Such reactions usually amount to kickback from pretentious bloggers which is "haha stupid anti-vaxxer doesn't know shit, now let me continue to run cover for our corrupt establishment and ignore the many people in our industry that want to treat humans as walking lab rats".