Early in the scamdemic, I tried to contact medical doctors to ask if the following procedure could be a way to immunize against covid: Withdraw some blood from a person, inoculate it with a few covid "cells", let the person's immune system (at least what is in blood) develop antibodies to it, kill off the virus in the blood sample, then inject it back into the person, where they would have antibodies ready if needed in the future. I got no response from about 3 or 4 attempts (contacting medical research facilities). Now, I'm thinking, what would happen if just 2 or 3 covid "cells" were injected into a person? Since it is a respiratory virus, wouldn't it easily be taken care of when in the blood, resulting in antibodies that could fight it if it ever was introduced into the respiratory system? I hope someone here has some expertise/insight on this idea.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
This should have been the strategy from the beginning but unfortunately the medical establishment decided that existing therapeutics and prophylactics would kill more people than the coof would and ran a full-bore smear campaign against them.
I think it was not employed because they knew it would work.
It was completely obvious. I said it about a month after it first started, once the low risk for otherwise healthy people was apparent. It was the obvious play for anyone who knows anything about biology.
Yep. One has to look to none other than the Fauch himself and his 2005 SARS publications in relation to Chloroquines and reducing virulence.
The gaslighting campaign reached historic levels. We've never seen anything like this in our time. This is the ultimate culmination to execute their push for full global control under the guise of a medical emergency.