Early in the scamdemic, I tried to contact medical doctors to ask if the following procedure could be a way to immunize against covid: Withdraw some blood from a person, inoculate it with a few covid "cells", let the person's immune system (at least what is in blood) develop antibodies to it, kill off the virus in the blood sample, then inject it back into the person, where they would have antibodies ready if needed in the future. I got no response from about 3 or 4 attempts (contacting medical research facilities). Now, I'm thinking, what would happen if just 2 or 3 covid "cells" were injected into a person? Since it is a respiratory virus, wouldn't it easily be taken care of when in the blood, resulting in antibodies that could fight it if it ever was introduced into the respiratory system? I hope someone here has some expertise/insight on this idea.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
My explanation only applies to Covid specifically. There may or may not be other vaccines or versions of vaccines historically that would involve injecting attenuated versions of a virus, inactivated (dead) virus, or in some cases the partial broken up proteins (recombinate) of a known virus to inoculate / immunize. Now we have the experimental mRNA vaccine type from Moderna / Pfizer and that vaccine type has been problematic every time it has been tried during animal trials historically (and by the info coming in is problematic here too). There's too many unknowns about all the ways mRNA vaccine interacts with the body and frankly medical science doesn't have a complete understanding about how immunology works systemically for any of the vaccines. More on vaccine types here if you are interested: https://www.news-medical.net/amp/health/What-are-the-Different-Types-of-Vaccines.aspx
Personally, I'm not keen on most any vaccine generated today for a number of reasons (ethics of how some are generated, the adjuvants (many adjuvants are toxic to one degree or another) which they include to cause your immune system to go on high alert and thus increase the chance of discovery of the vaccine virus and creating an immune response to them so that you are immunized.
If I had a health condition that made me particularly susceptible to a disease, I would study the vaccine and make an informed choice on how to proceed.
Other than the fact that these jabs contain some of the same adjuvants contained in vaccines and recombinant manufacturing with the adenovirus vector jabs, that is where the similarity ends. These are not vaccines. Both methods being deployed with these medical devices have the same end goal - to make the human body produce foreign proteins. The mRNA devices use a synthetic genetic sequence wrapped in a liposomal delivery system to deliver the sequence into the cell. The recombinant devices are using an adenovirus as a vector to deliver a similar genetic sequence and push it into the nucleus. Both modalities cause the body to manufacture spike proteins. There is no quarantine these sequences will not be permanently taken up into our DNA. Also, we do not know whether there is an off switch for the production of these foreign proteins. The ramifications of this experiment are incalculable.
These are not vaccines in a traditional sense at all. Both methods are not causing the body to create specific immunity from the introduction of a foreign antigen. The human body is being hijacked to manufacture foreign proteins that are biologically active. How in the world does this make sense? To cause our own bodies to manufacture the very thing that causes illness.
The fact that people cannot see the insanity of this boggles my mind. This has never been done before in humans. The prior animal studies that used this technology ended in disaster. The fact that people so blindly trust another with the most precious thing they possess - their very lives - has always caused me consternation. Their blind trust could very well cost them dearly.