My issue is that , it's extremely, extremely rare though and not the responsibility of others to manage for her.
He could have died from a lot of things. It's not people's duty to put themselves at risk to protect her kid. He was an outlier. She shouldn't have given him the flu vaccine, she has zero proof that didn't cause issues with his immune system.
If she's that much of a crackpot, she probably did a million and one things to damage his natural immunity as well.
Twats like her rarely breastfeed. That's going to bring the kid's immune system down. I have no proof that she didn't, but I'm going to hedge my bets on that she didn't.
This is everything. Every point, every desire, every demand of those pushing enforced vaccinations fails because of that one single point. You have a right to your own life, liberty, and property. You can't make others do what YOU think is best against their will, no matter how valid or invalid their reasoning or understanding is. You also can't use their money to pay to get it for yourself.
What really bothers me is that this attitude has become weaponized and almost a default for most people.
They believe that they're to be ensured a perfect bubble life where, if something happens, it's someone else fault and for that they must be compensated, least they swing their emotions around as a cudgel for the rest of eternity.
99.7% recovery virus = 100% must get vaccinated with a 50/50% experimental vaccine.
They want all risks mitigated, but only when it is something that gives them leverage over others.
Self determination has been morphed into selfishness, where true selfishness has become weaponized manipulation.
It's pretty astounding. It's not just the left either, it's both sides, I see it all the time on this site too, it's this weird attitude of always looking for an emotional manipulative route to control others. Sad.
My issue is that , it's extremely, extremely rare though and not the responsibility of others to manage for her. He could have died from a lot of things. It's not people's duty to put themselves at risk to protect her kid. He was an outlier. She shouldn't have given him the flu vaccine, she has zero proof that didn't cause issues with his immune system. If she's that much of a crackpot, she probably did a million and one things to damage his natural immunity as well.
Twats like her rarely breastfeed. That's going to bring the kid's immune system down. I have no proof that she didn't, but I'm going to hedge my bets on that she didn't.
not the responsibility of others
This is everything. Every point, every desire, every demand of those pushing enforced vaccinations fails because of that one single point. You have a right to your own life, liberty, and property. You can't make others do what YOU think is best against their will, no matter how valid or invalid their reasoning or understanding is. You also can't use their money to pay to get it for yourself.
What really bothers me is that this attitude has become weaponized and almost a default for most people.
They believe that they're to be ensured a perfect bubble life where, if something happens, it's someone else fault and for that they must be compensated, least they swing their emotions around as a cudgel for the rest of eternity.
99.7% recovery virus = 100% must get vaccinated with a 50/50% experimental vaccine.
They want all risks mitigated, but only when it is something that gives them leverage over others.
Self determination has been morphed into selfishness, where true selfishness has become weaponized manipulation.
It's pretty astounding. It's not just the left either, it's both sides, I see it all the time on this site too, it's this weird attitude of always looking for an emotional manipulative route to control others. Sad.
Bingo. Love it when people on this forum hit the bullseye!
^THIS^