I think it's key to remember as well, Senator Paul and President Trump never even looked like they had a falling out, unlike, say, Pence. Also, Senator Paul has reminded President Trump on more than one occasion of states' rights issues and the Tenth Amendment. Pres. Trump has consistently followed Sen. Paul's advice, and probably was given the heads up :Sen. Paul would try to send the certifications back to the state legislatures, which he believed to be the constitutional solution. I believe Pres. Trump and Sen. Paul have a mutual respect for each other. Frankly, I am as certain that Senator Paul will be found to be on the side of truth and justice as I am of President Trump.
I am of a similar mind. Of all 100 senators, Sen. Paul is the one person I think is the least likely to be corrupt. Other than the electoral college vote (which as I said, was likely at Trump's behest) I have never seen him do anything other than what appears to be on behalf of We The People.
Of course I trust no one, and am always on the lookout for hidden agenda's for everyone, but everyone gets a free pass on the electoral count from my view. The entire future of humanity was likely at stake there.
Remember at the end of November/beginning of December, 2020... Rand Paul was actually considering SPEARHEADING the motion to contest the state election certifications.
Then he went silent about it for a month...
Then at the beginning of January, still not talking about the States/votes, presented YET ANOTHER BILL to audit the Fed... which struck me as tone-deaf at the time, and I was very confused...
And then on 1/6/21 he stood up for States’ rights to uphold their own election results (Federalism), FREE FROM FEDERAL ENCROACHMENT. It felt like a HUGE let-down at the time.
I was perhaps the most bewildered by his stand on this issue.
But it makes so much sense now in the context of Q and the over -arching plan to restore Federalism. He was defending States propriety in holding their own elections.
He was being careful about not setting a dangerous precedent— I’m guessing because he knew that Q’s plan would take care of DS/Cabal conspiracy.
He knows more than he lets on. There’s a reason why he and Trump became staunch allies (after such a wrecking ball of campaigning during Primaries in 2015-2016). He’s pure Constitutionalist.
I think it's key to remember as well, Senator Paul and President Trump never even looked like they had a falling out, unlike, say, Pence. Also, Senator Paul has reminded President Trump on more than one occasion of states' rights issues and the Tenth Amendment. Pres. Trump has consistently followed Sen. Paul's advice, and probably was given the heads up :Sen. Paul would try to send the certifications back to the state legislatures, which he believed to be the constitutional solution. I believe Pres. Trump and Sen. Paul have a mutual respect for each other. Frankly, I am as certain that Senator Paul will be found to be on the side of truth and justice as I am of President Trump.
I am of a similar mind. Of all 100 senators, Sen. Paul is the one person I think is the least likely to be corrupt. Other than the electoral college vote (which as I said, was likely at Trump's behest) I have never seen him do anything other than what appears to be on behalf of We The People.
Of course I trust no one, and am always on the lookout for hidden agenda's for everyone, but everyone gets a free pass on the electoral count from my view. The entire future of humanity was likely at stake there.
Remember at the end of November/beginning of December, 2020... Rand Paul was actually considering SPEARHEADING the motion to contest the state election certifications.
Then he went silent about it for a month...
Then at the beginning of January, still not talking about the States/votes, presented YET ANOTHER BILL to audit the Fed... which struck me as tone-deaf at the time, and I was very confused...
And then on 1/6/21 he stood up for States’ rights to uphold their own election results (Federalism), FREE FROM FEDERAL ENCROACHMENT. It felt like a HUGE let-down at the time.
I was perhaps the most bewildered by his stand on this issue.
But it makes so much sense now in the context of Q and the over -arching plan to restore Federalism. He was defending States propriety in holding their own elections.
He was being careful about not setting a dangerous precedent— I’m guessing because he knew that Q’s plan would take care of DS/Cabal conspiracy.
He knows more than he lets on. There’s a reason why he and Trump became staunch allies (after such a wrecking ball of campaigning during Primaries in 2015-2016). He’s pure Constitutionalist.
We have the best frens, don't we, folks?