WATCH: Rand Paul GRILLS Fauci Over China LIE — Our Govt. FUNDED Research That Led To COVID-19!
(en-volve.com)
? DEM PANIC ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
I'm not entirely sure what you are referring to with "must be by the book" but NOT protesting the electoral vote is a perfectly legal action, no matter what the reason.
I don't believe he HAD to lose to be a part of a successful awakening, but they knew he would and planned accordingly.
You cannot bust anyone for treason if you told people to not stop the treason....He may have approached them with his damning evidence and let them decide. But I don't believe this works if you interfere with systems designed to stop the fraud. By the book.
And fyi, a person can be put to death(criminal) if they fail to do certain duties while in service to the nation. That is why they have you take an oath.
To be specific for Rand Paul lets look at a couple things he said when the electoral vote was in contest.
Here he is saying the States have the power and it is essential that they retain that power.
He is amplifying that statement of State's rights and giving direction on how to proceed. It just so happens to be exactly the direction we are currently proceeding.
I assert again, this was all part of the plan.
Thought we were talking about legal vs duty? Congress could have sent them back right? Why have them certify the states choices at the federal level at all? Heck, Trump is the President of the red states and Biden the blue if Congress had no power to help conduct a free and fair election for President right?
Which strawman is next? Ruby Freeman and kin caught ILEGALY invalidating an election in GA on video was a deep fake? Congress should have rejected this state on that video alone. Sent their envelope back asking for a full forensic audit. Duty.
To my original point. You can't legally tell someone not to do their sworn duty so you can catch someone else not doing their sworn duty.
Now, you can make deals with criminals in custody.....but then if they are now criminals, are they still elected officials with authority to conduct a certification?
All of your examples seem to be attempts at conflating illegal activity with a vote. Do you realize what it means to cast a vote? Do you realize that a person can vote in any way they choose for any reason whatsoever and that the people who founded this country fought and died for exactly and expressly that right?
You keep bringing up other things for why they voted wrong. I am focusing on the act of casting a vote, because THAT is the act in question. Any other action such as a "sworn duty" is something else entirely. No one is "sworn" to vote in any particular way ever, nor for any reason. Certainly no one is sworn to vote as you think they should.
Since I am talking about the legality of a vote, and I thought you were talking about the legality of a vote, this example right here of something completely unrelated to the topic of conversation would be a perfect example of a strawman argument.
Can you provide one single law that even implies that this is true?
Can you provide even one theoretical example of how this could possibly be true?
I suggest you are conflating one action with another. A vote is a vote and is sacred. OTHER actions can be treasonous, but not a vote itself.
There is no law that I am aware of that states abstaining from a vote is illegal, much less punishable by death.
To prove traitorous action would require OTHER actions than a mere abstention.
It may not be good, or moral by your or my standards, but its not illegal. That is an essential distinction that is fundamental to the Bill of Rights.
Abstaining is not interfering. One is inaction, one is action. Those are not the same thing in a legal sense, even though they both have the potential to promote a negative outcome.
I agree that sometimes inaction can be illegal, but I do not believe vote abstention is one of those inactions. If you wish to prove to me otherwise you would have to cite law.
You don't think all government officials involved in the election process have a duty to ensure a free and fair election? What do you call it when you intentionally fail at this duty? What if another country is involved (proven)?
No crimes to see here folks....
You are suggesting that a person can be punished for a vote?
So...
If a person chooses to vote one way, and you think that way is wrong, they should be punished?
That sounds just about as unAmerican to me as a thing can possibly be.
The right to choose how to vote, in ANY vote is one of the most sacred and fundamental rights that our country was founded upon. The reasons for your vote are fundamentally yours and no one has a right to pursue those reasons because that would be a direct violation of our inalienable rights.
If these people are complicit in a crime against the American people, evidence of that act must come from somewhere other than a vote.