Appologies for the length of this post, it’s a complex subject. Hopefully the links work, if not will post in comments.
Does Q mention the climate in any drops?
We have entered solar cycle 25, also known as the Eddy Minimum. GSMs happen every 350-400 yrs & last 50 -70 odd years, the last being the Maunder Minimum 1645 to 1710. Then came the Dalton Minimum 1796 – 1810 ish, not as severe as the Maunder but devastating none the less & part of the lesser 100 yr cycle. NASA predicts the current Eddy Minimum to be the weakest in the last 200 years & comparable with the Dalton Minimum, it will peak around 2025.
Maunder Min: enter text
Dalton Min with a focus on Australia, a very interesting read written from an Actuary (someone who deals with risk assessment) https://www.actuaries.asn.au/Library/Events/SUM/2013/Sum2013PaperBrentWalker.pdf
What does it all mean? Global cooling! Increased volcanic activity & earthquakes, decrease in magnetic field strength causing an increase in cloud nucleating cosmic rays & magma excitation. Increased volcanic activity partially blocks the sun causing global temps to drop, its complex. https://electroverse.net/we-entered-the-modern-grand-solar-minimum-on-june-8-2020/
Volcanic activity aside, the Jetstream is also affected causing some parts of the globe to actually get warmer while others get colder, we saw this recently with Siberia experiencing heatwaves while the U.S. experienced unseasonal severe cold snaps.
https://electroverse.net/recap-the-changing-jet-stream-and-global-cooling/
So what does it all mean for humanity? Basically massive crop failure, famine, reduced population due to starvation & the fall of empires. Yay, we certainly do live in interesting times. Not everyone will like how the movie ends. Glaciers will move south in the northern hemisphere which brings me to Trump ordering a fleet of icebreakers. Yes its true. Trumps icebreakers: https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2020/06/09/trump-memo-demands-new-fleet-of-arctic-icebreakers-to-be-ready-by-2029/ & https://www.naturalblaze.com/2020/06/trumps-new-icebreaker-fleet-and-the-grand-solar-minimum-2020.html
Roman Empire collapse https://www.livescience.com/okmok-volcano-roman-republic-collapse.html
Rise & fall of Empires in relation to solar activity, a great read
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/history/ancient-economies/solar-minimum-the-fastest-decline-in-almost-10000-years/? Prof. Valentina Zharkova study in full : https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23328940.2020.1796243
For the science buffs, Steve McIntyre, who is he? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_McIntyre Steve’s website is dedicated to revealing the truth about the stats presented to the public re climate change. He is famous for debunking the “hockey stick graph”. Be warned its heavy going but well worth it. https://climateaudit.org/ I pray that the plan includes a strategy to minimize loss of life due to famine brought on by crop failure. I don’t know if that’s even possible but it certainly could be alleviated by a massive change in farming practices & adaptation to the changes that are coming. As individuals I suggest if at all possible moving to warmer climate zones & out of cities. Finally learn to grow your own food. Just my 2 cents worth.
Great info, thanks.
np
Let's assume for a moment that (a) I am more or less right about everything above, and (b) the cabal leadership (the ones who are really calling the shots for the psychopaths to do what they do) also know these things, and probably much more.
If so, certain things start to make sense.
It puts things into a different perspective.
Having said that, there is no shortage of resources. That is also a lie. We are nowhere near close to an overpopulation problem.
Take the world's population. Let's say around 7.2 billion because it's close enough, and makes the math easy.
Let's say there were an average of 4 people per household. Some larger, some smaller. Let's say 4 on average, worldwide.
That means 7.2 billion/4 = 1.8 billion households would need to exist.
Let's say that each person lived in a house (no condos, apartments, mobile homes, etc.), and each house was on a quarter acre lot. That's a decent sized lot. Again, some larger and some smaller, but let's say this is average. An acre is roughly the size of a football field. So, 4 houses on a football field is not crowded.
With 1.8 billion houses/4 per acre = we would need 450,000,000 acres of land for all the people.
Alaska is 365,000,000 acres. Texas is 172,000,000 acres.
An area about 2.5 times the size of Texas would house the entire world's population.
Throw in some roads, offices complexes, shopping malls, etc., and the entire world's population would fit within 3-4 times the size of Texas, or about 2 Alaskas.
The rest of the planet would be entirely empty of all humans. Plenty of space to grow crops and raise animals.
Not even close to a real problem.
It is all a manufactured "problem" because certain people are psychopaths and want to control the world and own all the resources, including human resources.
That is the ONLY real threat we face.
Until the volcanoes start really popping & block the sun causing a winter that last 3 years give or take. Temps drop everywhere & crops fail. Im not sure how this will effect the equatorial regions but I cant image it will be any fun there either. The "watchers" do a weekly volcano report enter text
My understanding is that in a GSM volcanoes are far more likely to go off & in a big way. Also the earths crust is affected & earthquakes become far more prevalent. Sorry I cant spit the science out off the top of my head, but from memory its got something to do with the magnum being excited due to the sun.
Speaking of volcanos, the largest active volcano in the USA is in or near Yellowstone Park (Wyoming or Montana -- not sure).
I just recently found about about that.
I'm not sold on the idea that volcanos will block the Sun, at least not for more than a few days. Maybe weeks. And then, only for parts of the globe. Mt. St. Helens spewed into the air a few decades ago, but it had no real impact if you weren't in the immediate area.
Volcanos have erupted many times during recorded history, and never has it been catastrophic to the Earth as a whole. Of course, recorded history has always been within the interglacial period, so once that is over, who knows?
Also, I do not believe that the dinosaurs went extinct due to a meteor that caused a blockage of the Sun.
The dinosaurs lived during 3 eras, and the early ones went exinct as the later ones came on the scene. The last of them died off a few million years before Earth reached its highest temperatures, implying that it could have been because of the changing climate.
Overall, there have been 5 major extinctions in Earth's history, with upwards of 90% of all plants and animals dying off, only to be replaced by other species.
Seems more logical that these things occured due to real climate change (as opposed to the fake climate change being pushed).
Recent studies say different, I do hope your right tho. One of the links in the OP will take you to info on this. Its been theorised that volcanic activity caused the last winter that lasted a few years & caused massive starvation across Europe. Studies are beginning to prove this to be accurate.
Most of Yellowstone park is a volcano's caldera. Here's a map.
https://prd-wret.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/production/s3fs-public/styles/full_width/public/vhp_img5770.jpg
you should look up the Dinosaur Gravity Problem for another clue about the dinosaurs. to sum up - based on our current gravity the largest of the dinosaurs could not have been able to stand without their leg bones breaking. so what was going on then that would allow them to survive?
The powers that be know the truth. Look at all the land China is buying up in Africa, that arid region will be furtile land. They will need it for farming to feed their people.
As an aside there is a guy on YouTube, Tony Heller, that does great (and short!) Videos exposing all the lies from "science", msm, politicians, etc. He explains how they manipulate the data, or selectively leave out data that would throw off their narrative.