"Alright I have inside info from a close relative about the Bill and Melinda Gates divorce."
--Why am I doubting this from the very first sentence?
"I can 100% confirm the divorce is due to Bill's sexual behavior."
--You couldn't "100% confirm" that even if you were privy to Melinda's pillow secrets, because she might be lying. And might not be the original Melinda.
"Bill Gates very very well could be the first unsealed indictment Q mentioned. I have some Grade A Hopium for you in here."
--You've been here a year, and write like a string-along artist.
"I can 100% confirm she had NO IDEA the vaxx they hwve been pushing all over the years was harmful in ANY WAY despite MASSIVE news on it....please dont arrest me too...i mean 'her'"
Yeah, agree with you on that. It's larpy as fuck. It's using stuff available to the public with some light conjecture, it provides nothing new, just confirmation bias.
"Alright I have inside info from a close relative about the Bill and Melinda Gates divorce."
--Why am I doubting this from the very first sentence?
"I can 100% confirm the divorce is due to Bill's sexual behavior."
--You couldn't "100% confirm" that even if you were privy to Melinda's pillow secrets, because she might be lying. And might not be the original Melinda.
"Bill Gates very very well could be the first unsealed indictment Q mentioned. I have some Grade A Hopium for you in here."
--You've been here a year, and write like a string-along artist.
"I can 100% confirm she had NO IDEA the vaxx they hwve been pushing all over the years was harmful in ANY WAY despite MASSIVE news on it....please dont arrest me too...i mean 'her'"
Not fishy at all.
Yeah, agree with you on that. It's larpy as fuck. It's using stuff available to the public with some light conjecture, it provides nothing new, just confirmation bias.
Seeing the word "confirm" in an assertive post triggers the spidey senses instantaneously.
Thank you for your service.